Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shemastella Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$2.1MReligion$1.0MHuman Services$170kEducation$72kHealth$50kPhilanthropy$14kArts & Culture$13kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $423k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAESALIM USA$700,000
SISTERS OF MARY BOYSTOWN$500,000
KKOTDONGNAE INC$300,000
KOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL EDUCATION$223,346
KOREA HOPE FOUNDATION$200,000
DOSAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF AMERIC$40,000
ST THOMAS KOREAN CATHOLIC CENTER$26,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SPIRIT FILLED HEART MINISTRY$15,000
CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF AFRICAN CA$12,600
SOLPH$12,500
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CH$10,000
KOREAN MARTYRS CATHOLIC CENTER$7,000
MADISON HOUSE YOUTH CENTER$4,000
SPECTRUM OF HOPE FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $443k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KKOTDONGNAE INC: $300k → 14%KKOTTONGNAE INC: $100k → 14%KKOTTONGNAE INC: $20k → 14%KKOTTONGNAE INC: $10k → 14%KOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CEN: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 35% of Shemastella Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 27%.

Shemastella Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 18 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
22

Total granted

$3.5M
$745k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
0%

Still filing today

17%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WORLD VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M
  • KH
    KOREA HOPE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M
  • KI
    Kkottongnae Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $430k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGES FOR
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • TS
    THE SISTERS OF THE SOCIETY OF OUR
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • AM
    ASOCIACION MIRINE
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean Missionary Society Usa Inc

To support catholic fathers and missionaries all over the world

Religion
2
Korean American Network International

To spread the gospel to the underserved countries

International
3
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
4
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
5
Korea Christian Gospel Mission Inc

To spread the gospel of jesus christ and to look after orphans, students, handicapped, refugees and others in distress throughout the world. to sustain various buildings in korea for ongoing community services.

Religion
6
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
7
Korea Campus Crusade for Christinc

To evangelize and to do related activities for jesus.

—
8
Hands of Mercy International

To build individual houses for needy families in Mexico and direct them to Mexican pastors to further the gospel of Jesus Christ.

International
9
Utd Missions Inc

Preparing printing informational material, updating website, inviting guest speakers, traveling to various cities for organizing prayer movement for North Korean human rights

Religion
10
His Heart Missions Fellowship Inc

Missions

Religion
11
New Hope for the World

Uplifting the Lives of The Christian Minorities

Religion
12
Kpam Foundation

Christian missionary organization supporting North Korean orphans and defectors

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kkottongnae Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Spectrum of Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $1,160,000 · OtherWORLD VILLAGE FOR CHILDRENKOREA HOPE FOUNDATION: $1,056,900 · OtherKOREA HOPE FOUNDATIONSISTERS OF MARY BOYSTOWN: $500,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY BOYSTOWNSISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGES FOR: $500,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGES FORKOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL EDUCATION: $260,746 · OtherKOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL EDUCATIONKOREAN MARTYRS CATHOLIC CENTER: $157,000 · OtherDEUL KKOT MA EUL: $142,500 · Other+32 more: $455,709 · Other+32 moreDaesalim USA: $700,000 · ReligionDaesalim USA+3 more: $20,000 · ReligionKkottongnae Inc: $430,000 · Human ServicesKkottongn…HOME ON THE GREEN PASTURES: $30,000 · Human ServicesHOME ON T…+2 more: $13,000 · Human ServicesASOCIACION MIRINE: $30,000 · InternationalKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30,000 · HealthThe Spectrum of Hope Foundation: $12,000 · PhilanthropyKOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCharity Foundation for African Catholic Mission: $12,600 · EducationHUFS LAGCEO: $1,000 · Education
Other$4,232,855Religion$720,000Human Services$473,000International$30,000Health$30,000Philanthropy$17,000Education$13,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKkottongnae Inc: $430,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetHOME ON THE GREEN PASTURES: $30,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCharity Foundation for African Catholic Mission: $12,600 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetThe Spectrum of Hope Foundation: $12,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetKOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOOD HANDS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUFS LAGCEO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Daesalim USA ↗
  • Who funds Kkottongnae Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASOCIACION MIRINE ↗
  • Who funds HOME ON THE GREEN PASTURES ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Foundation for African Catholic Mission ↗
  • Who funds The Spectrum of Hope Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD HANDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kang Dream FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kang Dream Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shemastella Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shemastella Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shemastella Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shemastella Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shemastella’s filings →

    More from the funding graph