Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Shelby County United Way

SHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAY, inc.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$4.7MHealth$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.2MYouth Development$1.1MHousing & Shelter$652kCrime & Legal$292kFood & Nutrition$271kCommunity Improvement$140kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $443k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $663k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA CHILDCARE DEV CENTER$120,000
MERCY MISSION HOUSE$85,000
WILMA VALENTINE AGENCY$80,000
SPECIAL PROJECTS$71,633
COMPASSIONATE CARE$70,000
AGENCY ALLOCATIONS POWER$65,924
NEW CHOICES$60,000
SAMARITAN WORKS$55,000
ALPHA COMMUNITY CENTER$55,000
VICTIM SERVICES$45,000
SENIOR HEALTH-CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVI$45,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES - COUNSELI$40,000
SHERIFF STAR HOUSE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
SENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY SHELBY COUN$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA CHILDCARE DEV CENTER: $120k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $113k → 9%YMCA CHILDCARE DEV CENTER: $110k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $105k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $93k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $93k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $93k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $90k → 9%SIDNEYSHELBY CO YMCA: $70k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $70k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $65k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $60k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $60k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $60k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $60k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $55k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $55k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $55k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $55k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $55k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $55k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $55k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $55k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $50k → 9%YMCA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $50k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $50k → 9%NEW CHOICES: $50k → 9%SAMARITAN WORKS: $45k → 9%SENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY SHELBY COUN: $40k → 9%SENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY SHELBY COUN: $35k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $31k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $31k → 9%SENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY SHELBY COUN: $30k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $25k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $20k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $19k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $17k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $17k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $16k → 9%SHELBY COUNTY ARC: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 33 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
5

Total granted

$10M
$159k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SIDNEY & SHELBY COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $937k · revenue +80%
  • SC
    SHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $730k · revenue +13%
  • WV
    WILMA VALENTINE CHILDCARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $692k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
  • WC
    WFP CAREER COUNSELOR
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • SP
    SPECIAL PROJECTS
    one grant, 2023 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheffield Care Center Inc

At the sheffield care center our mission, through dedicated teamwork, is to provide all who enter our doors with a clean, comfortable, home-like atmosphere where honesty, dignity, respect and genuine compassion for one another prevails.

Human Services
2
Shelby County Cares

Provide awareness in the community of mental health needs and suicide rates. provide support, education, and counseling for those in need.

Health
3
The Safehouse of Shelby County Inc

Temporary shelter for abused spouses and their children.

4
Shelby Senior Services Inc

The mission of shelby senior services, inc is to respond to the ever-changing needs of seniors and their families, to affect in positive ways their quality of life, and to assist in maintaining their independence.

Human Services
5
Shelby County Senior Citizens Assoc Inc

To promote and organize nutritional services, quality care giving, social and educational activities for shelby county senior citizens and create public awareness about senior citizens issues and concerns.

Human Services
6
Shelby County Ambulance Commission

Ambulance commission

7
Sayre Christian Village Nursing Home Inc

A non-profit senior living community dedicated to providing quality housing, rehabilitative services and long-term nursing care reflecting christian compassion for everyone.

Health
8
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
9
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
10
Sherman County Community Services Inc

To provide a community service by providing a place where a family can enjoy a safe environment

Community Improvement
11
Shelby County Chamber of Commerce Inc

We advocate for business growth and support the success of our members while collaborating with partners to promote shelby county as a highly desirable community in which to live, work, and play.

12
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelby County United Way and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAY — $729,684 · OtherSHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAYWILMA VALENTINE CHILDCARE INC — $691,539 · OtherWILMA VALENTINE CHILDCARE INCALPHA COMMUNITY CENTER — $660,500 · OtherALPHA COMMUNITY CENTERCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY — $650,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEYSHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE — $631,500 · OtherSHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEOTHER UNITED WAY DONOR DESIGNATION — $545,125 · OtherOTHER UNITED WAY DONOR DESIGNATIONIndividual grant recipient — $292,237 · OtherCLEAR CREEK FARM — $270,700 · OtherCOUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC — $270,660 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MIAMI VALLEY COUNCIL 444 — $239,500 · OtherAgape Distribution — $237,500 · Other+17 more — $1,444,849 · Other+17 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SIDNEY & SHELBY COUNTY — $937,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A…SAMARITAN WORKS INC — $515,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN WORKS INCNEW CHOICES INC — $495,000 · Human ServicesNEW CHOICES INCSHELBY COUNTY ARC INC — $191,125 · Human ServicesSHELBY COUNTY ARC INCSENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY — $105,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASSIONATE CARE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC — $665,000 · HealthSAFEHAVEN INC — $164,000 · HealthMERCY MISSION HOUSE — $435,001 · Housing & ShelterBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SHELBY & DARKE COUNTY INC — $410,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY WORKFORCE — $60,000 · Education
Other$6,663,794Human Services$2,243,125Health$829,000Housing & Shelter$435,001Youth Development$410,000Education$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SIDNEY & SHELBY COUNTY — $937,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetSHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAY — $729,684 over 9y, 13% of budgetWILMA VALENTINE CHILDCARE INC — $691,539 over 9y, 19% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE CARE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC — $665,000 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetALPHA COMMUNITY CENTER — $660,500 over 9y, 52% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY — $650,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN WORKS INC — $515,000 over 9y, 51% of budgetNEW CHOICES INC — $495,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetMERCY MISSION HOUSE — $435,001 over 5y, 23% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SHELBY & DARKE COUNTY INC — $410,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetCLEAR CREEK FARM — $270,700 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC — $270,660 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MIAMI VALLEY COUNCIL 444 — $239,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT — $205,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetSHELBY COUNTY ARC INC — $191,125 over 9y, 51% of budgetSAFEHAVEN INC — $164,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetSENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY — $105,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetSIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY WORKFORCE — $60,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SIDNEY & SHELBY COUNTY
  • Who funds SHELBY COUNTY UNITED WAY
  • Who funds WILMA VALENTINE CHILDCARE INC
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ALPHA COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY
  • Who funds SAMARITAN WORKS INC
  • Who funds NEW CHOICES INC
  • Who funds MERCY MISSION HOUSE
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SHELBY & DARKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CLEAR CREEK FARM
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MIAMI VALLEY COUNCIL 444
  • Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds SHELBY COUNTY ARC INC
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN INC
  • Who funds SENIOR CENTER OF SIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY
  • Who funds SIDNEY-SHELBY COUNTY WORKFORCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Shelby CountyOH36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Shelby County · Honda of America Foundation · The Troy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shelby County United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph