Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sharp Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$853k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$9.0MEducation$2.1MArts & Culture$2.0MScience & Tech$1.1MReligion$150kHousing & Shelter$68kFood & Nutrition$55kHuman Services$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
  • $250k+2 grants · $710k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIT PRESS FUND FOR THE FUTURE$460,000
THE TERMEER FOUNDATION$250,000
CANCER ENGINEERING WORKSHOP AT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENSES$52,000
ELIOT CHURCH OF NEWTON$15,000
THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN$5,000
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,000
CONGREGATIONAL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
ASPEN CANCER CONFERENCE INC$5,000
FRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS$5,000
OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION$5,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$5,000
SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE$5,000
LIFE SCIENCES CARES$3,500
THE SECOND STEP INC$3,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD AND FUEL ALLIANCE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUNGAR MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 9%HUNGAR MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 9%HUNGAR MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 9%HUNGAR MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 9%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $1k → 16%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $1k → 16%HUNGAR MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
NC
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 45 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
32

Total granted

$3.7M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+10%

Still filing today

64%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +131%
  • UC
    UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +58%
  • OM
    OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • PA
    PHILLIP AND ANN SHARP LIFE SCIENCES FELLOWSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS - PHILLIP & ANN SHARP CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
  • MM
    MIT MUSEUM AT KENDALL EXHIBITIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $1.5M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
4
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
5
Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Inc

Massbio is committed to advancing massachusetts' leadership in the life sciences to grow the industry, add value to the health care system and improve patient lives.

—
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is More Than Words Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dreamfar High School Marathon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
31/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHILLIP AND ANN SHARP LIFE SCIENCES FELLOWSHIP FUND: $5,000,000 · OtherPHILLIP AND ANN SHARP LIFE SCIENCES FELLOWSHIP FUNDUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS - PHILLIP & ANN SHARP CANCER CENTER: $2,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS - PHILLIP & ANN SHARP CANCER CENTERMIT MUSEUM AT KENDALL EXHIBITIONS: $1,500,000 · OtherMIT MUSEUM AT KENDALL EXHIBITIONSMGH FOR DEPT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY - HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 · OtherMGH FOR DEPT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY - HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS - SHARP PROFESSORSHIP: $500,000 · OtherCAL TECH - ADVANCEMENT & ALUMNI RELATIONS: $500,000 · OtherMIT PRESS FUND FOR THE FUTURE: $470,000 · OtherKOCH INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE CANCER RESEARCH AT MIT: $450,000 · Other+48 more: $726,857 · Other+48 moreWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $1,007,000 · HealthWHITEHEAD …THE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 · HealthTHE TERMEE…+7 more: $102,700 · Health+7 moreUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Education+10 more: $62,951 · EducationFRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $19,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $10,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10,000 · Science & TechBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureHUNGER MOUNTAIN CHILD CENTER INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$12,146,857Health$1,359,700Education$1,112,951Housing & Shelter$68,000Science & Tech$39,000Arts & Culture$30,500Human Services$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $1,007,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTHE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreensboro Independent School Corp: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY HEALTH: $26,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHUNGER MOUNTAIN CHILD CENTER INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SECOND STEP INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CANCER CONFERENCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNEAST COASTAL CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFriends of the Waterbury Library: $8,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetConcord Hospital Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEWTON FREE LIBRARY: $8,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPORTER MEMORIAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBAKER FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetNEW GARDEN FRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMOSKEAG ROWING CLUB: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALBRIGHT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CONCORD CREW: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMFAR HIGH SCHOOL MARATHON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATERBURY AREA MAKERSPHERE COOPERATIVE INC: $501 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT ADULT BASIC EDUCATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN PERFORMING ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Greensboro Independent School Corp ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER MOUNTAIN CHILD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SECOND STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CANCER CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds DOWNEAST COASTAL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Waterbury Library ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sharp Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sharp Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Central Vermont Adult Basic Education Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • The Second Step Inc: 26% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Hunger Mountain Child Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sharp Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Sharp Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sharp’s filings →

More from the funding graph