Skip to content
Sharity Ministries Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Sharity Ministries Inc

Through god's guidance, bring together people of a common set of religious beliefs for the purpose of voluntarily sharing one another's medical expense burdens and so fulfill the law of christ.

$181k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Religion$129kHealth$96kEducation$55kHousing & Shelter$46kHuman Services$5k
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $171k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH DRIVEN LIFE CHURCH$121,000
ATLANTA PARTNERS FOR EDUCATION$50,000
SHELTERING ARMS$5,001
KATE'S CLUB INC$5,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KATE'S CLUB INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Idaho Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Idaho supports families of ill or injured children by keeping them together in times of medical need. Families are the center of our purpose and we provide them with a safe and secure place for healing…

Health
5
Ronald Mcdonald House of New York Inc

Our mission is to provide a strong, caring and seamless circle of support for patients of pediatric cancer and other complex illnesses and their families. in recent years rmhny has expanded its footprint across the boroughs and extended…

Health
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Oregon and Southwest Washington

The organization provides a "home away from home" to families with seriously ill children, and supports initiatives to improve pediatric health.

Health
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc

The mission of the ronald mcdonald house of houston, inc. is to offer a home away from home and to provide care, compassion, and hope to families with seriously ill children being treated in texas medical center member institutions.

Health
8
Ronald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest

We, in partnership with our community, provide a comfortable and caring home away from home that supports keeping families together and reduces stress during a child's serious illness.

Health
9
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis, Inc. sees a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children. They provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and…

Health
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Pittsburgh and Morgantown Inc

Rmhc provides a way for families to stay close to their children receiving medical care, and is committed to helping the families lead happier, healthier and more productive lives.

Health
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Indiana Inc

To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Georgia Canines for Independence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC: $128,500 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREARonald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc: $10,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Charities New York Metro IncCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATIONFAMILIES OF CHILDREN UNDER STRESS INC: $6,500 · Other+3 more: $16,001 · Other+3 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH …ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $20,000 · HealthATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUS…PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST …CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INCRonald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charit…Scott & White Healthcare Foundation: $9,000 · HealthScott & White Healthcare Fou…ATLANTA PARTNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · EducationATLANTA PARTNERSH…CAMP KUDZU INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentKATE'S CLUB INC: $5,001 · Human Services
Other$181,001Health$84,000Education$50,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$5,001

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTA PARTNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP KUDZU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF CHILDREN UNDER STRESS INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGeorgia Canines For Independence Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 28% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC: $5,001 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHELTERING ARMS INC: $5,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…The Community Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Shell USA Company Fou…Enterprise Holdings F…Verizon FoundationRaymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…The Pfizer Foundation…
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC14.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sharity Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sharity Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sharity Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home