Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$227kHealth$123kSocial Science$15kFood & Nutrition$9kPhilanthropy$7kYouth Development$5kArts & Culture$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$492k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
niac$75,025
QUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST$10,000
WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC$10,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$10,000
save the children$2,000
THE INTERCEPT$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOOD SHARE: $500 → 10%SAFER CROCKER: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SACRAMENTO ST: $500 → 12%LUNCH ON ME LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%ST JOHNS VILLAGE: $450 → 16%THE INTERCEPT: $2k → 17%AJAM MEDIA COLLECTIVE KICKSTARTER: $5k → 20%niac: $75k → 14%save the children: $2k → 9%PAR SCHOOL: $1k → 7%SIRAT HOUSE CHICAGO: $1k → 14%ADVANCING REAL CHANGE: $103 → 19%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $10k → 14%ST JOHNS VILLAGE: $325 → 16%THE INTERCEPT: $2k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $55k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $20k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $10k → 14%YOLO CARES: $500 → 16%THE INTERCEPT: $440 → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $50k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $15k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $8k → 14%QUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST: $10k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $50k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $15k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $5k → 14%QUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST: $5k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $25k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $10k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $5k → 14%QUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST: $5k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $15k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $10k → 10%INTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $5k → 14%QUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST: $5k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $11k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $7k → 10%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $600 → 14%IRANIAN ALLIANCES ACROSS BORDERS: $5k → 17%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $5k → 10%NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10k → 14%WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $5k → 10%OUR COMMUNITY HOUSE OF HOPE: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 10 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$410k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
0%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +503%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +18%
  • CV
    CONEJO VALLEY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • AM
    AJAM MEDIA COLLECTIVE KICKSTARTER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IA
    Iranian Alliances Across Borders
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • OC
    Our Community House of Hope
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
2
Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action

The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Action is a grassroots, member-led, statewide community organization working with more than 16,000 members in six counties across California, dedicated to raising the voices of…

Human Services
3
Nourish California

To collaborate with diverse community partners for policy change, ensuring equitable access to food, health, and well-being for all Californians.

Food & Nutrition
4
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley

The Law Foundation uses the law as a tool for change. The Law Foundation addresses problems linked to social injustices like poverty, discrimination, child abuse, and neglect. Every day, our attorneys, social workers, and advocates craft…

Crime & Legal
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
6
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
7
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
8
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
9
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
10
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
11
Californians for Safe and Affordable Housing

To combat community deterioration, defend human and civil rights secured by law, and promote the common good and social welfare of the people by educating the public and advocating with respect to the importance of safe and affordable…

—
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Share Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conejo Valley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

National Iranian American Council: $226,230 · InternationalNational Iranian American Council+1 more: $2,000 · Internationalniac: $75,025 · OtherniacINTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANC: $42,500 · OtherINTL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCQUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ST: $25,000 · OtherQUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE STALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $17,500 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK+12 more: $23,164 · Other+12 moreWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $86,500 · HealthWESTMINSTER FREE CL…CONEJO VALLEY FOUNDATION: $6,500 · PhilanthropySAFER CROCKER: $1,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD SHARE INC: $600 · Food & NutritionAdvancing Real Change Inc: $103 · Crime & Legal
International$228,230Other$183,189Health$86,500Philanthropy$6,500Community Improvement$1,000Food & Nutrition$600Crime & Legal$103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Iranian American Council: $226,230 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $86,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetIranian Alliances Across Borders: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOur Community House of Hope: $3,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAFER CROCKER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAdvancing Real Change Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Iranian American Council ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CONEJO VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Iranian Alliances Across Borders ↗
  • Who funds Our Community House of Hope ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFER CROCKER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Advancing Real Change Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Advancing Real Change Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company?

Find your warmest path to Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shams Foundation Co Blankstein & Company’s filings →

More from the funding graph