Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shakir Charitable Trust

The organization mission is to promote and providing relief, assisstance ,contribtions or education in connection with medical ,health, educational and charitable services.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$512kEducation$46kInternational$35kHousing & Shelter$33kCivil Rights$27kHuman Services$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISLAMIC ASSOC OF GREATER DETROIT$50,000
ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA$20,000
QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$10,000
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY$6,000
ISLAMIC CULTURAL INSTITUTE$2,000
AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL$2,000
CENTER FOR ARAB AMERICAN PHILANTHRO$2,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT$2,000
MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICE$2,000
MUSLIM CENTER$2,000
AL-IKHLAS TRAINING ACADEMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DREAM OF DETROIT: $10k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $10k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $5k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $5k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $3k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$667k · 18 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$667k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+113%

Still filing today

39%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TQ
    THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $48k · revenue +102%
  • WF
    Women for Humanity
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +52%
  • DO
    Dream of Detroit
    5× · 2019–2023 · $33k · revenue +280%

Funded once

  • ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +113%
  • MC
    MUSLIM CENTER OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • UU
    UNIFIED UNDER HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas

Religious organization for the islamic community of northwest arkansas

Religion
3
Islamic Circle of North America

Religous orginization

Religion
4
Islamic Association of texas Inc

Provide a peaceful place of prayer for the local community and helping those in need with human essentials.

Religion
5
Islamic Center of Wallingford

Place of worship

Religion
6
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
7
Islamic Society of San Francisco

Religious-mosque/masjid

—
8
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
9
Long Beach Islamic Center

Relegious Services

Religion
10
Indo-Chinese Islamic Center

The mission of this organization is to worship god, teach islamic religion to muslim communities and other interested individuals, and provide a place for devoted muslims to practice their religion

Religion
11
Afghan Community Islamic Center Inc

It is afghan islamic community center. the organization's mission is to establish afghan mosque and afghan cemetery. to provide educational services to the afghan community at large.

Arts & Culture
12
Iqra Masjid Community & Tradition Inc

Mosque & community center

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islamic Association of Greater Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Dream of Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $140,000 · OtherISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA INCISLAMIC CULTURAL INSTITUTE: $24,500 · OtherISLAMIC CULTURAL INSTITUTEISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT INC: $24,500 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT INCMASJID AL-IKHLAS & AL-IKHLAS TRAINING ACADEMY: $24,500 · OtherMASJID AL-IKHLAS & AL-IKHLAS TRAINING ACADEMYOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITYCENTER FOR ARAB AMERICAN PHILANTHRO: $22,000 · OtherCENTER FOR ARAB AMERICAN PHILANTHROMUSLIM CENTER: $19,500 · OtherMUSLIM CENTERMUSLIM FAMILY SERVICE: $19,500 · OtherMUSLIM FAMILY SERVICE+3 more: $16,500 · OtherISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DETROIT: $150,000 · ReligionISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DETRO…COUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION: $40,000 · ReligionCOUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATIONINTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH AMERICA: $9,000 · ReligionISLAMIC ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $9,000 · ReligionISLAMIC CENTER OF WARREN: $9,000 · ReligionWomen for Humanity: $35,000 · InternationalWomen for …AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC: $27,000 · InternationalAMERICAN H…THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $47,695 · EducationDream of Detroit: $32,500 · Human ServicesICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$315,000Religion$217,000International$62,000Education$47,695Human Services$32,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DETROIT: $150,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $47,695 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCOUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION: $40,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetWomen for Humanity: $35,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetDream of Detroit: $32,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC: $27,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetISLAMIC ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF WARREN: $9,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Women for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Dream of Detroit ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF WARREN ↗
  • Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fountain of Knowledg FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · The Syed Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · The Kadry Foundation · Dr Nussri Foundation · Sattar Family Foundation · Basha Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shakir Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shakir Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shakir’s filings →

    More from the funding graph