Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shafer Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$187kHuman Services$90kReligion$78kArts & Culture$51kHousing & Shelter$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHealth$33kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON$8,000
ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$7,000
EPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,000
THE STATE THEATRE$5,000
MASONIC CHARITIES FUND$5,000
MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM$5,000
MASONIC CHARITIES FUND$5,000
VISITING NURSE ASSOC OF BETHLEHEM$5,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$4,000
LEHIGH VALLEY ZOO$4,000
ST LUKE'S SCHOOL OF NURSING$4,000
PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT$3,000
FLINT HILL FARM EDUCATIONAL CENTER$3,000
ARTSQUEST$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%CENTER FOR VISION LOSS INC: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$555k · 29 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
8

Total granted

$555k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+37%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +83%
  • GL
    GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +95%
  • AV
    ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • MH
    MASONIC HOMES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MV
    MASONIC VILLAGES OF THE
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • BA
    BETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provide emergency medical services.

—
2
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

—
3
Bethlehem Township Volunteer Fire Co

Operation of a fire company that provides residents of bethlehem township and surrounding municipalities with fire suppression, rescue, and emergency medical services.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
5
Seven Mountains Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

The council is a key component of the emergency medical services system in central pennsylvania, serving as a vital link between local ems agencies and the pennsylvania department of health. as a independent non-profit corporation and the…

Health
6
Sewickley Public Library

The mission of the Sewickley Public Library is to provide lifelong learning oppurtunities to the children and adults of the greater Quaker Valley Community.

Education
7
Scranton Public Library

Public lending library

—
8
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
9
Jewish Family Service of the Lehigh Valley

Jewish family service of the lehigh valley, guided by jewish values, helps individuals and families to live healthier, more stable lives by providing social services, professional counseling, education, and community programs. our vision…

Human Services
10
Valley Day School

Valley day school is a private, non-profit, state-funded, special education school licensed by the pennsylvania department of education for students who are experiencing learning and/or adjustment difficulties.

—
11
Delaware Valley Hospital Inc

See schedule oas a critical access hospital and member of the uhs healthcare system, delaware valley hospital's mission is to provide the community with the high quality, patient-centered services that are most often needed; thereby…

Health
12
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artsquest; the most unlike its peers is Project of Easton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
19/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHAFER FAMILY CHARITABLE: $145,000 · OtherSHAFER FAMILY CHARITABLETHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC: $43,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INCGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATIONEPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $26,000 · OtherEPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHST LUKE'S SCHOOL OF NURSING: $16,000 · OtherST JOHN'S EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOC OF BETHLEHEM: $15,000 · OtherST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,000 · Other+15 more: $93,500 · Other+15 moreSTATE THEATRE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSTATE THE…ARTSQUEST: $15,000 · Arts & CultureARTSQUESTSTATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTATE THE…PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePENNSYLVA…+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $33,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUpper Nazareth Fire Department Inc: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterEQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesSIGHTS FOR HOPE: $5,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc: $12,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionLEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $11,000 · Animals
Other$423,500Arts & Culture$50,500Public Safety & Disaster$34,500Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$22,000Food & Nutrition$18,000Animals$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC: $43,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $33,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE THEATRE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetARTSQUEST: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc: $12,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA: $5,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSIGHTS FOR HOPE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE FILM INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM ↗
  • Who funds STATE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSQUEST ↗
  • Who funds Flint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUI-LIBRIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL RECREATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Upper Nazareth Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE FILM INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Ppl Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · Waldman Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shafer Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shafer Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shafer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph