Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shafer Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$187kHuman Services$90kReligion$78kArts & Culture$51kHousing & Shelter$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHealth$33kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON$8,000
ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$7,000
EPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,000
THE STATE THEATRE$5,000
MASONIC CHARITIES FUND$5,000
VISITING NURSE ASSOC OF BETHLEHEM$5,000
MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM$5,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
MASONIC CHARITIES FUND$5,000
LEHIGH VALLEY ZOO$4,000
ST LUKE'S SCHOOL OF NURSING$4,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$4,000
PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT$3,000
FLINT HILL FARM EDUCATIONAL CENTER$3,000
ARTSQUEST$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM INC: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%EQUI-LIBRIUM: $2k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%CENTER FOR VISION LOSS INC: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$555k · 29 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
8

Total granted

$555k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+37%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +83%
  • GL
    GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +95%
  • AV
    ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • MH
    MASONIC HOMES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MV
    MASONIC VILLAGES OF THE
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • BA
    BETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provide emergency medical services.

2
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

3
Bethlehem Township Volunteer Fire Co

Operation of a fire company that provides residents of bethlehem township and surrounding municipalities with fire suppression, rescue, and emergency medical services.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

5
Seven Mountains Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

The council is a key component of the emergency medical services system in central pennsylvania, serving as a vital link between local ems agencies and the pennsylvania department of health. as a independent non-profit corporation and the…

Health
6
Sewickley Public Library

The mission of the Sewickley Public Library is to provide lifelong learning oppurtunities to the children and adults of the greater Quaker Valley Community.

Education
7
Scranton Public Library

Public lending library

8
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

9
Jewish Family Service of the Lehigh Valley

Jewish family service of the lehigh valley, guided by jewish values, helps individuals and families to live healthier, more stable lives by providing social services, professional counseling, education, and community programs. our vision…

Human Services
10
Valley Day School

Valley day school is a private, non-profit, state-funded, special education school licensed by the pennsylvania department of education for students who are experiencing learning and/or adjustment difficulties.

11
Delaware Valley Hospital Inc

See schedule oas a critical access hospital and member of the uhs healthcare system, delaware valley hospital's mission is to provide the community with the high quality, patient-centered services that are most often needed; thereby…

Health
12
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artsquest and the most unlike its peers is Project of Easton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr18%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr18%26%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
10%
307/3,168

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
19/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHAFER FAMILY CHARITABLE — $145,000 · OtherSHAFER FAMILY CHARITABLETHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $43,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INCGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATIONEPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $26,000 · OtherEPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHST LUKE'S SCHOOL OF NURSING — $16,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOC OF BETHLEHEM — $15,000 · OtherST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherST JOHN'S EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH — $15,000 · Other+15 more — $93,500 · Other+15 moreSTATE THEATRE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureSTATE THE…ARTSQUEST — $15,000 · Arts & CultureARTSQUESTSTATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTATE THE…PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA — $5,000 · Arts & CulturePENNSYLVA…+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $33,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUpper Nazareth Fire Department Inc — $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterEQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesSIGHTS FOR HOPE — $5,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc — $12,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $6,000 · Food & NutritionLEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $11,000 · Animals
Other$423,500Arts & Culture$50,500Public Safety & Disaster$34,500Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$22,000Food & Nutrition$18,000Animals$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $43,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $33,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE THEATRE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetARTSQUEST — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc — $12,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHTS FOR HOPE — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA — $5,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE FILM INSTITUTE — $500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALBRIGHTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
  • Who funds MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM
  • Who funds STATE THEATRE INC
  • Who funds ARTSQUEST
  • Who funds EQUI-LIBRIUM INC
  • Who funds Flint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds STATE THEATRE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC
  • Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds SPECIAL RECREATION SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Upper Nazareth Fire Department Inc
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE FILM INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Ppl Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · Waldman Family Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shafer Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph