Skip to content
Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$142kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kHealth$40kInternational$28kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$10kEmployment$330Other$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $44,732, the rows itemized in this filing. The $54,732 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc$15,432
Everglades Foundation$10,000
Young Musicians Unite, Inc$10,000
Young Survival Coalition$8,500
All Hands and Hearts$470
Career Gear$330
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 3 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +173% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$60k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+173%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $44k · revenue +78%
  • AB
    AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +173%
  • TP
    The Pap Corps Champions for Cancer Research
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k

Funded once

  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TS
    The Source Farm Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • GK
    Give Kids The World
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $44,048 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE…INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION: $25,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSI…The Source Farm Foundation: $10,000 · OtherThe Source Farm FoundationGive Kids The World: $2,766 · OtherGive Kids The World+2 more: $1,330 · OtherNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,432 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CAN…YOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $8,500 · HealthYOUNG SURVIVAL COAL…AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $14,682 · Human ServicesAMERICAN BR…YOUNG MUSICIANS UNITE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Environment
Public Safety & Disaster$44,048Other$39,096Health$23,932Human Services$14,682Arts & Culture$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $44,048 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,432 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $14,682 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS UNITE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $142k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sfc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home