· Private foundation
Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $44,732 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $54,732 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc | $15,432 |
| Everglades Foundation | $10,000 |
| Young Musicians Unite, Inc | $10,000 |
| Young Survival Coalition | $8,500 |
| All Hands and Hearts | $470 |
| Career Gear | $330 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +173% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC2× · 2021–2023 · $44k · revenue +78%- ABAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +173%
- TPThe Pap Corps Champions for Cancer Research2× · 2021–2022 · $1k
Funded once
- IPINTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- TSThe Source Farm Foundationone grant, 2020 · $10k
- GKGive Kids The Worldone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MUSICIANS UNITE INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sfc Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.