Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Seven Sisters Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$58kYouth Development$36kInternational$35kReligion$33kCrime & Legal$25kCivil Rights$20k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$647k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$20,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES$10,000
IMMIGRATION COALITION$5,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$5,000
WORLD RELIEF$5,000
UNITED HANDS SERVICES INC$1,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CIRCLES OF CARE INC: $5k → 17%HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%SALEM 4 YOUTH: $15k → 12%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 14%SALEM 4 YOUTH: $10k → 12%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%SALEM 4 YOUTH: $6k → 12%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%SALEM 4 YOUTH: $5k → 12%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$175k · 8 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$175k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCivil RightsReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +54%
  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +79%
  • EC
    EXODUS CRY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AD
    A DOOR OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • CO
    CIRCLES OF CARE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • KC
    KIDS CENTRAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
2
Love Justice International

The mission of love justice international is driving the downfall of slavery by disrupting human trafficking in transit.

International
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

4
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
5
His House Inc

His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.

6
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

7
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
8
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

9
Children's Choice Inc

Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…

Human Services
10
Rescue 1 Global

Our mission is to counter human trafficking and provide holistic restoration: at home and around the world.

International
11
Arkansas Justice Collective Aiding Survivors of Trafficking and Chil

Arkansas justice collective is a nonprofit law firm serving survivors of trafficking and child abuse across arkansas and the region.

Public Benefit
12
Freedom to Captives

To further the name of christ in an international environment by holding church and evangelistic services including house of prayer and training center for equipping people in futhering christianity. the english language is also taught in…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Central Inc and the most unlike its peers is Immigration Coalition Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $40,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCESALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $36,000 · Human ServicesSALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INCHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INCCIRCLES OF CARE — $5,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLES OF CAREEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $25,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEIMMIGRATION COALITION CORPORATION — $20,000 · Civil RightsIMMIGRATION COALITION CO…LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $20,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHAN…EXODUS CRY INC — $10,000 · InternationalEXODUS CRY INCWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $5,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP O…BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $20,000 · OtherBETHANY CHRIST…UNITED HANDS SERVICES INC — $4,100 · OtherUNITED HANDS S…HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF AUSTIN — $3,000 · OtherHOPE COMMUNITY…A DOOR OF HOPE INC — $5,000 · ReligionKIDS CENTRAL INC — $4,000 · Health
Human Services$91,000Civil Rights$45,000International$35,000Other$27,100Religion$5,000Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $36,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRATION COALITION CORPORATION — $20,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEXODUS CRY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLES OF CARE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS CENTRAL INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seven Sisters Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph