Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seth Bonder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$423k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MEducation$1.1MYouth Development$745kArts & Culture$227kScience & Tech$117kReligion$60kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
$21,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$176,047
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION$80,000
INFORMS$73,500
BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY$35,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES$21,000
LESLIE SCIENCE & NATURE CENTER$10,000
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN$10,000
GIRLS GROUP$10,000
SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC$7,750
HURON VALLEY TENNIS CLUB$12
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEMPHIS OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $31k → 17%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $85k → 13%INFORMS: $74k → 11%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $80k → 13%INFORMS: $52k → 11%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $80k → 13%INFORMS: $52k → 11%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $80k → 13%INFORMS: $51k → 11%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $80k → 13%INFORMS: $47k → 11%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $120k → 9%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $65k → 13%INFORMS: $47k → 11%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $100k → 9%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%INFORMS: $45k → 11%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $85k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $35k → 17%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $35k → 13%INFORMS: $41k → 11%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $65k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $35k → 17%INFORMS: $41k → 11%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $65k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $35k → 17%FACES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT: $65k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $31k → 17%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $39k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $31k → 17%VAN WEZEL FOUNDATION: $34k → 9%BRINKLEY HEIGHTS URBAN ACADEMY: $30k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $210k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $176k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $170k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $156k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $140k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $110k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $105k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $196k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $146k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $35k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%GIRLS GROUP: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 16 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$3.9M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

50%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +202% · 93% of their budget
  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $555k · revenue +103%
  • GIRLS GROUP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEMPHIS OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue -25%
  • FE
    FIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -47%
  • JR
    JC RUNYON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memphis Academy of Science and Engineeri

To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Girls Global Academy Public Charter School

Girls global academy public charter school (gga) was incorporated in the district of columbia in june 2019 and opened its doors in august 2020 fostering pathways to lead and learn. as an all-girls public charter high school, gga ignites…

—
4
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission On Colleges Inc

The southern association of colleges and schools commission on colleges is the regional body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the southern states. the commission's mission is the enhancement of…

Education
5
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
6
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
7
Babson College

Babson college educates entrepreneurial leaders who impact communities everywhere.

Education
8
Baltimore Educational Scholarship Trust

The baltimore educational scholarship trust, in partnership with our seventeen independent member schools, recruits and supports through the admissions process academically ambitious, african american students with financial need from the…

Education
9
Barnard College

Barnard college aims to provide the highest quality liberal arts education to promising and high-achieving young women, offering the unparalleled advantages of an outstanding residential college in partnership with a major research…

Education
10
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
11
Collegiate School of Memphis

To prepare young ladies and gentlemen for college success within a highly-structured, nurturing, christian environment.

Education
12
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Sarasota and Desoto Counties Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Baltimore Orioles Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $1,408,452 · OtherUniversity of MichiganINFORMS: $447,300 · OtherINFORMSSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $232,350 · OtherSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INCLESLIE SCIENCE AND NATURE CENTER: $127,000 · OtherLESLIE SCIENCE AND NATURE CENTER+7 more: $113,278 · OtherGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $555,280 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION …Brinkley Heights Urban Academy Inc: $241,700 · EducationBrinkley Heights Urban A…MEMPHIS OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC: $30,800 · Education+2 more: $23,000 · EducationFaces of Accomplishment Inc: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentFaces of Accomplishmen…GIRLS GROUP: $255,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROUP+1 more: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $1,500 · HealthFIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBREAST CANCER ERADICATION INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyORPHEUM THEATRE GROUP: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,328,380Education$850,780Youth Development$776,000Health$1,500Arts & Culture$1,000Philanthropy$1,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,408,452 over 9y, 93% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $555,280 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFaces of Accomplishment Inc: $500,000 over 6y, 74% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $255,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetBrinkley Heights Urban Academy Inc: $241,700 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $232,350 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetLESLIE SCIENCE AND NATURE CENTER: $127,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetMEMPHIS OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC: $30,800 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJC RUNYON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BALTIMORE ORIOLES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER ERADICATION INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetORPHEUM THEATRE GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Faces of Accomplishment Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Brinkley Heights Urban Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LESLIE SCIENCE AND NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds JC RUNYON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BALTIMORE ORIOLES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ERADICATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seth Bonder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seth Bonder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seth Bonder Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Seth Bonder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seth Bonder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph