· Public charity
Service Employees' Local No 1
Labor union
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $73,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $108,221 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,221 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED FOR JUSTICE - CO SEIU 32BJ | $23,000 |
| DEVELOPMENT NOW FOR CHICAGO | $20,000 |
| ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR | $10,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSEIU LOCAL 1 SCHOLARSHIP FUND CHARITABLE TRUST4× · 2019–2022 · $127k · revenue +66% · 53% of their budget
- ICILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +497%
ARISE CHICAGO3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue +372%
Funded once
- SESERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNI MICHIGAN STRENGTH IN ACTION COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +605%
- GIGeorgia Investor Action Fund Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +232%
- RSRevived Soldiers Ukraineone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.
To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.
Collective bargaining and representation
Promote and protect the interests of the members of the local
To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…
The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…
Labor union
Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.
Seiu local 2015 is a chartered local union of the service employees international union and is an unincorporated, tax-exempt association currently representing bargaining unit members.
The joint board's purpose is to organize workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status in life. the joint board also promotes efficient service to the public and the best interest for member's…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seiu Healthcare Illinois & Indiana and the most unlike its peers is Revived Soldiers Ukraine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEIU LOCAL 1 SCHOLARSHIP FUND CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNI MICHIGAN STRENGTH IN ACTION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ARISE CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION ↗
- Who funds SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL NO 73 ↗
- Who funds Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENT NOW FOR CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds SEIU HEALTHCARE ILLINOIS & INDIANA ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN TRANSITION 2019 ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO ALDERMANIC BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Service Employees International Illinois Council · Seiu Healthcare Illinois & Indiana · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Service Employees' Local No 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.