· Private foundation
Service Center of Greater Lawrence Co Josephine Paolino
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY ROSARY SHRINE | $1,600 |
| TULANE UNIV FOR JAMES MELANSON | $1,500 |
| RIT FOR SAMANTHA CAIL | $1,500 |
| CHARITABLE EDUCATION TRUST | $1,500 |
| RIVIER COLLEGE FOR CONOR WALSH | $1,500 |
| U MASS BOSTON FOR V VENTRILLO | $1,500 |
| NEIGHBORS IN NEED | $1,000 |
| LAZARUS HOUSE | $1,000 |
| EAGLE TRIBUNE SANTA FUND | $1,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| BREAD AND ROSES | $1,000 |
| STONEHILL COLLEGE FOR CARLY COLLETT | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| COR UNUM MEAL CENTER | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LAZARUS HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +14%- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches5× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +9%
WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- UAUMASS AMHERSTone grant, 2017 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
BABSON COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Laboure college provides high-quality education and prepares women and men for careers in nursing and allied health fields.
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
It is the mission of work,inc. to ensure that all individuals with disabilities have the ability to grow, the right to make choices, access to education, and the opportunity to participate in community life via meaningful work.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Grounded in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities New Hampshire responds to those in need with programs that heal, comfort, and empower.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Assist people with disabilities
Resident Service Coordinators are professionals who serve elders, youth and families in their housing communities. NERSC provides training & professional development, including on-line courses for Resident Service Coordinators and housing…
Pine street inn housing ii, inc. is a massachusetts not-for-profit corporation, which was organized to provide ten elderly individuals with housing facilities and services at the inn's menino house at geneva avenue in boston,…
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
Our mission at elizabeth seton residence calls us to provide compassionate, caring service and to create an atmosphere where all feel welcome and respected. we are an 84-bed skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility, providing care to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Ann's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD & ROSES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTER KIDS OF MERRIMACK VALLEY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LAWRENCE HERITAGE STATE PARK ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Charlotte Home · The Bulens Family Foundation · Rogers Family Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Service Center of Greater Lawrence Co Josephine Paolino funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St Ann's Home Inc — 51% of income from government
- Three Saints Inc — 50% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Neighbors in Need Inc — 3% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Service Center of Greater Lawrence Co Josephine Paolino?
Find your warmest path to Service Center of Greater Lawrence Co Josephine Paolino through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.