Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seramur Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$387k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MRecreation & Sports$312kReligion$182kYouth Development$173kHuman Services$143kEnvironment$99kPhilanthropy$62kArts & Culture$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL$200,000
GRAND THEATER$50,000
OPERATION BOOTSTRAP$35,060
ST ANTHONY OF PADUA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION$23,000
CITY OF STEVENS POINT$17,000
UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTAGE COU$2,500
MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL SCHOOL$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WIS$1,000
TOMAHAWK LAKE ASSOCIATION$500
PORTAGE COUNTY CULTURAL FESTIVAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $35k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $20k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $15k → 10%CAP SERVICES: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$2.1M
$418k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+34%

Still filing today

35%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $173k · revenue +117%
  • OB
    OPERATION BOOTSTRAP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +144%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EMERSON PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • NJ
    NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concerned Citizens of Portage Lake

Portage Lake environment preservation

Environment
2
The Portage Foundation

The portage foundation inspires, impacts, and engages the portage county community by ensuring pathways of enduring support to meet local needs. we are committed to integrity and accountability in connecting donors with recipients,…

—
3
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
4
Portage Area Jt Recreation Commission
Recreation & Sports
5
Portage Animal Protective League

To shelter and find homes for injured, abused and abandoned animals,uphold and enforce animal cruelty laws, reduce pet overpopulation and educate the community.

Animals
6
Potawatomi Park Inc
—
7
Portage Parks and Recreation Foundation Inc

To promote and assist the portage parks department

Recreation & Sports
8
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
9
Portage Crooked Lakes Improvement Association

Preservation, improvement of lake, and education of members

Environment
10
Winous Point Marsh Conservancy

To assure the protection and stewardship of one of ohio's largest wetlands; to facilitate wetland conservation and restoration efforts in the more than 15,000 acres contiguous to and including the conservancy property; to increase research…

Environment
11
Manitowoc County Historical Society Inc

Historical education and preservation

Arts & Culture
12
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Portage County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Bootstrap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $700,000 · OtherCRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOLMID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $350,000 · OtherMID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGEPACELLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC: $251,500 · OtherPACELLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INCST ANTHONY OF PADUA: $175,000 · OtherST ANTHONY OF PADUACOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WIS: $102,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+30 more: $533,200 · Other+30 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $172,500 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $130,060 · Human ServicesCAP SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $53,536 · AnimalsTAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationTomahawk Lake Association Inc: $4,500 · EducationASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 · HealthPORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,000 · Arts & CulturePortage County Cultural Festival Inc: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,211,700Youth Development$172,500Human Services$140,060Animals$58,536Education$39,500Health$23,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $172,500 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $130,060 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $53,536 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAP SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $7,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetTAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTomahawk Lake Association Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPortage County Cultural Festival Inc: $3,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BOOTSTRAP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SCHMEECKLE RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Tomahawk Lake Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Portage County Cultural Festival Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin IncWI30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Peters Family Foundation Inc · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Edward J Okray Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · McPartland Family Foundation Inc · Noel Family Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Wisconsin Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seramur Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seramur Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seramur Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph