Skip to content
Sentara Rmh Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sentara Rmh Medical Center

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

$7.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$33MEducation$140kHuman Services$63kHousing & Shelter$39kArts & Culture$12k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $7,233,171, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,640,567 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $407,396 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $97k
  • $250k+1 grant · $7.1M
$7,136,061
Median grant
1
States reached
$282M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENTARA HEALTH$7,136,061
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$97,110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING SERVICE: $17k → 29%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING SERVICE: $14k → 29%NEW BRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $19k → 11%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING SERVICE: $13k → 29%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING SERVICE: $13k → 29%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING SERVICE: $6k → 29%NEW BRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 8 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$33M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+86%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SENTARA HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32M · revenue +493%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $150k · revenue +192%
  • VP
    VALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $63k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY CONNECTIONS OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +86%
  • HC
    HARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +24%
  • HC
    HARRISONBURG CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
2
Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
3
Augusta Medical Group

to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
4
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Hazleton

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and clinical research.

Health
5
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital - Pocono

Our mission is who we are and what we do: to provide world class care close to home. our vision is what we aim for to best serve our community: to build a healthier community.

Health
9
Olivet Medical Ministry Inc

Lackey clinic's mission is to provide skilled, compassionate health care and counseling to the medically disadvantaged in a manner that honors the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
10
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
11
Obria Medical Clinic of Ames

To provide reproductive healthcare in a way which empowers our community to make informed, life-affirming decisions. our core values are to be christ-centered, excellence, compassion, humility, and a passion for life.

Health
12
Sentara Rmh Medical Center

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brain Injury Connections of the Shenandoah Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eastern Mennonite University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENTARA HEALTH: $31,874,704 · HealthSENTARA HEALTH+3 more: $61,300 · HealthJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $467,492 · OtherBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherHARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM FREE CLINIC INC: $65,114 · OtherEastern Mennonite University: $40,000 · OtherVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $62,742 · Human ServicesNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $24,300 · Human ServicesHARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $12,000 · Arts & CulturePOSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC: $6,500 · Philanthropy
Health$31,936,004Other$722,606Human Services$87,042Arts & Culture$12,000Philanthropy$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENTARA HEALTH: $31,874,704 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetHARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM FREE CLINIC INC: $65,114 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $62,742 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTRENGTH IN PEERS INC: $38,800 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $24,300 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetBRAIN INJURY CONNECTIONS OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $12,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHARRISONBURG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHARRISONBURG CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Sentara HealthDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham CountyVA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Sentara Health · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sentara Rmh Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sentara Rmh Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sentara Rmh Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home