Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sens Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$228kReligion$129kHealth$60kHuman Services$58kPhilanthropy$58kArts & Culture$35kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$25,000
WATERTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS$10,000
LAKE FOREST ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $15k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $5k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE AT HOME: $5k → 8%CAMBRIDGE AT HOME: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MA
NJ
CO
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$494k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-7%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +39%
  • CN
    CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +9%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MA
    MOSESIAN ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • VC
    VNA CARE NETWORK & HOSPICE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • WF
    WATERTOWN FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Waterbury Development Corporation

To stimulate and support economic and housing development within the communities of the city of waterbury.

Community Improvement
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
6
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
9
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
10
Wallin Education Partners

To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…

Education
11
Waterford School Holding Corporation

We provide students with a world-class liberal arts education that stimulates intellect, ignites passion, and shapes character.

Education
12
Whatcom Community College Foundation

The wcc foundation strengthens educational opportunities by providing student scholarships, supporting faculty and staff development, and assisting with key college initiatives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Watertown Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Arnold Gold Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMBRIDGE INSIGHT MEDITATION CENTER INC: $78,500 · OtherCAMBRIDGE INSIGHT MEDITATION CENTER INCCOMMUNITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCHTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF MAYFLOWER: $15,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF MAYFLOWERMOSESIAN ARTS: $15,000 · OtherMOSESIAN ARTSVNA CARE NETWORK & HOSPICE: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $14,500 · Other+4 moreTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $67,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION I…LAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $41,375 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADEMYCAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC: $57,500 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE …WATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $57,500 · PhilanthropyWATERTOWN …WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$268,000Education$188,375Human Services$57,500Philanthropy$57,500Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $67,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC: $57,500 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetWATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $57,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $41,375 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 95%
  • Watertown Community Foundation Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sens’ filings →

More from the funding graph