Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sens Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$228kReligion$129kHealth$60kHuman Services$58kPhilanthropy$58kArts & Culture$35kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$25,000
WATERTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS$10,000
LAKE FOREST ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $15k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $5k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE AT HOME: $5k → 8%CAMBRIDGE AT HOME: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MA
NJ
CO
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$494k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$494k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-7%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +39%
  • CN
    CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +9%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MA
    MOSESIAN ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • VC
    VNA CARE NETWORK & HOSPICE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • WF
    WATERTOWN FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Waterbury Development Corporation

To stimulate and support economic and housing development within the communities of the city of waterbury.

Community Improvement
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
6
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
9
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
10
Wallin Education Partners

To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…

Education
11
Waterford School Holding Corporation

We provide students with a world-class liberal arts education that stimulates intellect, ignites passion, and shapes character.

Education
12
Whatcom Community College Foundation

The wcc foundation strengthens educational opportunities by providing student scholarships, supporting faculty and staff development, and assisting with key college initiatives.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Watertown Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Arnold Gold Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMBRIDGE INSIGHT MEDITATION CENTER INC — $78,500 · OtherCAMBRIDGE INSIGHT MEDITATION CENTER INCCOMMUNITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCHTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA — $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF MAYFLOWER — $15,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF MAYFLOWERMOSESIAN ARTS — $15,000 · OtherMOSESIAN ARTSVNA CARE NETWORK & HOSPICE — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $14,500 · Other+4 moreTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $80,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $67,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION I…LAKE FOREST ACADEMY — $41,375 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADEMYCAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC — $57,500 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE …WATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $57,500 · PhilanthropyWATERTOWN …WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$268,000Education$188,375Human Services$57,500Philanthropy$57,500Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $67,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC — $57,500 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetWATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $57,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY — $41,375 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE NEIGHBORS INC
  • Who funds WATERTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
  • Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC
  • Who funds THE DOROTHY AND CHARLES MOSESIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 95%
  • Watertown Community Foundation Inc95% of income from government
  • Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph