Skip to content

· Private foundation

Semmler Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$153kHealth$113kEducation$94kHousing & Shelter$80kFood & Nutrition$77kPublic Benefit$14kReligion$11kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$595k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL$20,000
COMMITTEE ON CHURCH COOPERATION$18,000
DUNCANVILLE OUTREACH MINISTRY$18,000
IN THE PINK$18,000
CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH$13,500
LIFE LINE SHELTER FOR FAMILIES$12,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
FRIENDS OF WELAKA$8,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC$2,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC: $2k → 8%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $14k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $9k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $8k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $672 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
VA
TN
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$718k · 14 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$718k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+271%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +23%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +29%
  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • LS
    LIFELINE SHELTER
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • DA
    DAILY AUDIO BIBLE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • FH
    Fellowship Housing Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +271%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
2
St Paul Homes

The mission of st paul's formed and sustained by the judeo-christian faith and historically related to the united church of christ, is to provide meaning and richness to the life of each resident and health care services for those who seek…

Human Services
3
The Family Radio Network Inc

The family broadcasts the hope of jesus christ to strengthen and encourage listeners.

—
4
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
5
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
6
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
7
Christian Care Foundation Inc

To support and help expand the ministry of christian care by teaching generous giving, securing philanthropic gifts and administering such gifts with biblical principles.

—
8
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
12
Turning Point for God

To broadcast the Gospel of Jesus Christ through the available means including television, radio, internet, recorded, and written formats.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $127,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNOTRE DAME SCHOOL: $83,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOLIN THE PINK: $79,000 · OtherIN THE PINKMAYO CLINIC: $28,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICOPERATION BLESSINGS: $22,000 · OtherOPERATION BLESSINGSMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $16,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WELAKA INC: $14,000 · Other+7 more: $27,075 · Other+7 moreCOMMITTEE ON CHURCH COOPERATION: $78,000 · Human ServicesCOMMITTEE ON CHURCH COOPERATIO…Duncanville Outreach Ministry: $77,000 · Human ServicesDuncanville Outreach MinistryCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $51,172 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesLIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $69,790 · Housing & ShelterLIFELINE FO…Fellowship Housing Corporation: $4,454 · Housing & ShelterFellowship …FUNK-ZITIELLO FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $5,000 · Religion
Other$396,075Human Services$208,172Housing & Shelter$74,244Philanthropy$52,000Health$17,000Education$11,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMITTEE ON CHURCH COOPERATION: $78,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDuncanville Outreach Ministry: $77,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetLIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $69,790 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetFUNK-ZITIELLO FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $51,172 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFellowship Housing Corporation: $4,454 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON CHURCH COOPERATION ↗
  • Who funds Duncanville Outreach Ministry ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FUNK-ZITIELLO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DAILY AUDIO BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds Fellowship Housing Corporation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Semmler Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Semmler Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Semmler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph