· Public charity
Seminole State College Educational Foundation Inc
Seminole State College Educational foundation provides support to Seminole State College, scholarships for Seminole State College students, and economic development for surrounding areas.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of Seminole State College Educational Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $625k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $374k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Grow 356 LLC | $1,677,485 |
| Seminole State College | $174,312 |
| Flying O Machine LLC | $100,000 |
| Foundation Training Ranges LLC | $50,000 |
| Foundation Stocks LLC | $50,000 |
| Housing Authority of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Benson True Value Hardware | $20,000 |
| South Central Industries Inc | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Living Moss LLC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Auld Construction LLC | $20,000 |
| Jearl Smart Foundation | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $771k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- G3Grow 356 LLC2× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M
- HDHiland Dairy Foods3× · 2020–2022 · $793k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2020–2023 · $543k
Funded once
- TOTown of Wellstonone grant, 2020 · $345k
- RBRural Business and Resources Centerone grant, 2020 · $217k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $155k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organizations mission is to foster an environment of creativity and culture through public art and activation in downtown. projects funded are meant to inspire conversation and wonder and to activate unused space or reinvent existing…
To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma
Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.
Economic development in okmulgee county
Promote business and community growth through economic development programs designed to strengthen and broaden the income potential of the seminole trade area; to develop civic, social, and cultural programs designed to increase the…
To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.
The goal of the oklahoma media center is to support and strengthen oklahoma's local journalism ecosystem and spur innovation through statewide collaboration that benefits diverse audiences and educate/informs the public on important…
The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.
Economic development of woodward, ok and northwestern oklahoma.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seminole Nation Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Jearl Smart Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seminole State College Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- East Central Oklahoma Family Health Center Inc — 43% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.