Skip to content
Selfless Love Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Selfless Love Foundation Inc

Selfless love is dedicated to transforming the lives of current & former foster youth.

$620k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$178k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.2MYouth Development$216kRecreation & Sports$20kHealth$16k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $601,457, the rows itemized in this filing. The $619,518 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,061 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $303k
$24,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TX CTR FOR CHILD & FAMILY STUDIES$178,083
THE SETTLEMENT HOME$71,374
CHILDRENS HARBOR INC$53,500
THE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL$47,000
HEARTLAND FOR CHILDREN INC$40,500
PARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG FAMILIES$37,500
FAMILIES FIRST INC$25,500
SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC$24,500
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF N FL$24,500
CHILDRENS NETWORK OF HILLSBOROUGH$21,000
YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC$20,000
KIDS CENTRAL INC$19,500
CARRYING HOPE$15,000
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF SUNCOAST$14,500
KIDS FIRST OF FLORIDA INC$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TX CTR FOR CHILD & FAMILY STUDIES: $208k → 10%SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $29k → 9%KIDS FIRST OF FLORIDA INC: $11k → 9%THE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL: $32k → 11%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF SUNCOAST: $24k → 12%CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $203k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF N FL: $29k → 14%YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $75k → 17%FAMILY-MATCH ADOPTION SHARE INC: $404k → 14%SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $25k → 9%KIDS FIRST OF FLORIDA INC: $9k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF SUNCOAST: $16k → 12%CHILDRENS NETWORK OF HILLSBOROUGH: $21k → 13%CHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $58k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF N FL: $25k → 14%FAMILIES FIRST INC: $24k → 16%YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $20k → 17%ADOPTION SHARE INC: $250k → 14%TX CTR FOR CHILD & FAMILY STUDIES: $126k → 10%SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $16k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF SUNCOAST: $15k → 12%CHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $54k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF N FL: $16k → 14%ADOPTION SHARE INC: $250k → 14%CARRYING HOPE: $15k → 10%CAMELOT COMMUNITY CARE INC: $75k → 12%FAMILY-MATCH ADOPTION SHARE INC: $175k → 14%CAMELOT COMMUNITY CARE INC: $9k → 12%FAMILY-MATCH ADOPTION SHARE INC: $175k → 14%ADOPTION-SHARE INC: $51k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 14 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$2.8M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ADOPTION-SHARE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +473% · 58% of their budget
  • TC
    TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $333k · revenue +68%
  • CH
    CHILDRENS HARBOR INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $315k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FF
    FAMILY FIRST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $24k · revenue +16%
  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF HILLSBOROUGH LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive array of critical human services.

Human Services
2
Centers for Children and Families Inc

Centers for children & families, inc. exists to improve quality of life and strengthen the communities we serve through counseling, education and supportive services

Human Services
3
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
4
Family Resource Center of South Florida Inc

Family resource center of south florida, inc prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect through the strengthening of families. respectfully treat, rehabilitate and mentor troubled families through comprehensive, responsive care.…

Crime & Legal
5
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
6
Casey Family Programs
Philanthropy
7
Childnet Inc

Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.

Human Services
8
Childnet Youth & Family Services

To provide safe homes, education and counseling to vulnerable children and families. the program philosophy reinforces personal responsibility and emphasizes the need for a strong family unit.

Human Services
9
Children's Choice Inc

Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…

Human Services
10
Family Foundations Counseling Services

The mission of Family Foundations Counseling Services is to prevent child abuse and neglect, to ensure the wellbeing of every child and youth we serve, and to aid in building strong resilient families.

Health
11
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
12
Abrazo Foster Family Agency

Our Mission is to take the lead in protecting children entrusted to our care or protection from further abuse and neglect by carefully selecting the most qualified and dedicated foster parents available to operate foster homes for the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Central Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADOPTION-SHARE INC: $1,305,007 · Human ServicesADOPTION-SHARE INCTEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $333,475 · Human ServicesTEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIESCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $314,614 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HARBOR INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $125,000 · Human ServicesCAMELOT COMMUNITY CARE INC: $104,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $95,000 · Human Services+6 more: $252,000 · Human Services+6 morePARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG FAMILIES INC: $117,500 · HealthPARTNERSH…THE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $71,374 · HealthTHE SETTL…Lifeview Group Inc: $41,500 · HealthLifeview …KIDS CENTRAL INC: $19,500 · HealthKIDS CENT…TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $178,083 · OtherCHILDREN'S NETWORK OF HILLSBOROUGH LLC: $21,000 · OtherHeartland for Children Inc: $80,500 · Youth DevelopmentJockey Being Family Foundation Ltd: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$2,529,596Health$249,874Other$199,083Youth Development$80,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADOPTION-SHARE INC: $1,305,007 over 6y, 58% of budgetTEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $333,475 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $314,614 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG FAMILIES INC: $117,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMELOT COMMUNITY CARE INC: $104,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHeartland for Children Inc: $80,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $71,374 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $69,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $69,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF SUNCOAST: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLifeview Group Inc: $41,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetFAMILY FIRST INC: $24,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS FIRST OF FLORIDA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJockey Being Family Foundation Ltd: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKIDS CENTRAL INC: $19,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarrying Hope: $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Volunteer Florida Fou…Dave Thomas Foundatio…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Volunteer Florida Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Selfless Love Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Selfless Love Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Camelot Community Care Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Family Support Services of North Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partnership for Strong Families Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Selfless Love Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Selfless Love Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Selfless Love’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home