Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seisolo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.7MArts & Culture$2.1MEducation$1.8MFood & Nutrition$60kInternational$40kHuman Services$38kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $720k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.7M
$60,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO SEISOLO CHARITABLE FUND$3,655,540
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUND$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$200,000
BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL$150,000
COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS$60,000
COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS$60,000
BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA EDUCATION$50,000
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$10,000
COLORADO ARCS (ACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS)$7,500
ST PAUL CENTRAL HS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$7,500
OUR (OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE) CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUND: $200k → 17%RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO SEISOLO CHARITABLE FUND: $3.7M → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUND: $200k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUND: $200k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $50k → 14%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $60k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $60k → 12%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $50k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $44k → 12%COLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $40k → 12%Colo Music FestivalCtr for Musical: $30k → 12%Colo Music FestivalCtr for Musical: $30k → 12%Colorado Music FestivalCtr Musical: $30k → 12%Colorado Music FestivalCtr Musical: $30k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $150k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $150k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $150k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $150k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $150k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%Boulder Bach Festival: $75k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $75k → 12%Boulder Bach Festival: $75k → 12%Boulder Bach Festival: $25k → 12%BOULDER BACH FESTIVAL: $25k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA EDUCATION: $50k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA EDUCATION: $50k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA EDUCATION: $50k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $40k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $40k → 12%BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 18 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$4.0M
$38k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMPASS RESONANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +79% · 47% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $680k · revenue +79%
  • University of Chicago
    4× · 2019–2022 · $250k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • BP
    Boulder Philharmonic Educ Outreach
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SP
    ST PAUL CENTRAL HS CLASS1963 SCHOOL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • GI
    GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Collins Symphony Association

Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.

—
2
Colorado Music Bridge

Colorado nbsp;music nbsp;bridge nbsp;provides nbsp;access nbsp;to nbsp;inclusive nbsp;modern nbsp;music nbsp;education nbsp;programs nbsp;curricular nbsp;resources nbsp;and nbsp;professional nbsp;development

Arts & Culture
3
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
4
Denver Children's Choir

To provide a challenging environment where children can reach their full potential by enhancing their musical talents, forging diverse meaningful friendships, and sharing their joy of music with others.

Arts & Culture
5
Colorado Children's Chorale

The mission of the colorado children's chorale is to share professional choral music with the global community by training excellent young performers.

Arts & Culture
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
8
Colorado Music Festival & Center for Musical Arts

To inspire and connect community members of all ages by providing access to the best of the world's music through education and performance.

Arts & Culture
9
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
10
Denver Hybrid College

To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.

Education
11
Colorado Mahlerfest

Advancement of music through the celebration of the legacy of the composer Gustav Mahler through an annual festival

Arts & Culture
12
University of Northern Colorado Foundation

The foundation is entrusted to provide support and steward donations for the university of northern colorado.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Colorado Foundation; the most unlike its peers is I Have a Dream Foundation of Boulder County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO SEISOLO CHARITABLE FUND: $3,655,540 · OtherRENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO SEISOLO CHARITABLE FUNDCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUND: $600,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TRIFUNAC-THURNAUER FUNDCOLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $404,000 · OtherCOLO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR FOR MUSICAL ARTSCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALCTR MUSICAL ARTS: $200,000 · Other+11 more: $426,000 · Other+11 moreCOMPASS RESONANCE: $1,075,000 · Arts & CultureCOMPASS RESONANCEBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $260,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER PHILHARMONI…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $680,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …University of Chicago: $250,000 · EducationUniversity of …+1 more: $30,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · International
Other$5,285,540Arts & Culture$1,335,000Education$960,000Food & Nutrition$60,000International$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPASS RESONANCE: $1,075,000 over 8y, 47% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $680,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $260,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetI Have A Dream Foundation Of Boulder County: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPASS RESONANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds I Have A Dream Foundation Of Boulder County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Boulder CountyCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seisolo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seisolo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seisolo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Seisolo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seisolo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph