Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Seibert Charitable Trust -Trust A(Mff)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$465kPhilanthropy$12k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$875k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER$7,500
Carolina Wildlife Center$7,500
PAWMETTO LIFELINE$7,000
ANIMAL MISSION$7,000
ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF SC$6,000
PETS INC$6,000
NEWBERRY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEALING SPECIES: $8k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $7k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $7k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $7k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $5k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $5k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $5k → 25%HEALING SPECIES: $4k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$460k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$460k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PAWMETTO LIFELINE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +50%
  • CA
    CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +87%
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEWBERRY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
2
Promoting Animal Welfare in North Carolina

Our main program is providing vet care to animals dropped at or rescued from the local animal shelter. This is the only service we provide and where our expenses go. We spay/neuter animals adopted from the shelter and provide vet care to…

Animals
3
Animals First Rescue of the Carolinas Inc

Rescue unwanted dogs and cats from high kill shelters and other dire circumstances. Provide veterinary care shelter and love until the pet is placed into an appropriate new home.

Animals
4
Michelles Rescue Tails

Our mission is to save abandoned or surrendered dogs and cats by placing them in loving foster homes providing them with veterinary care including spay neuter finding responsible adopters and ultimately creating a community where all…

Animals
5
Project Safe Pet

To provide a safe haven for unwanted animals for temporary care while awaiting permanent placement.

Animals
6
Southern Counties Rescue Inc

We rescue, cats and kittens, provide necessary vetting including spay and neutering, vaccines and microchipping and adopt into permanent home. The animals we rescue come from kill shelters and off the street, abandoned animals. We try to…

Animals
7
Fur Ever Home Cat Sanctuary

Provide loving care & home for approx 120 Feral Cats that are in danger out in streets/unadoptable. TNR projects for feral cat colonies around Horry County. Provide Vet & medication care for animals in-house.

Animals
8
Carolina Coonhound Rescue

dog care and adoptions

Animals
9
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

Animals
10
Carolina Pet Adoption and Welfare Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate and re-home abandoned and abused dogs and cats. All animals are kept in foster homes and we hold weekly adoption events.

Animals
11
Southern Souls Rescue

Animal Welfare and Rescue.

Animals
12
Helping South Carolina Inc

Animal Rescue, TNR, & Community Outreach

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Animal Mission and the most unlike its peers is Avian Conservation Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER — $65,963 · AnimalsAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTERPAWMETTO LIFELINE — $61,200 · AnimalsPAWMETTO LIFELINECHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $52,354 · AnimalsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETYHEARTWORM PROJECT — $51,000 · AnimalsHEARTWORM PROJECTTHE ANIMAL MISSION — $36,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL MISSIONCAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC — $24,707 · AnimalsCAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC+1 more — $5,000 · AnimalsPETS INC — $45,500 · OtherPETS INCANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF SC — $43,060 · OtherANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF …S Q Rescue Inc — $33,094 · OtherS Q Rescue IncHEALING SPECIES INC — $47,000 · Human ServicesHEALING SPE…CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,100 · Philanthropy
Animals$296,224Other$121,654Human Services$47,000Philanthropy$12,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER — $65,963 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPAWMETTO LIFELINE — $61,200 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $52,354 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTWORM PROJECT — $51,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetHEALING SPECIES INC — $47,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MISSION — $36,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetS Q Rescue Inc — $33,094 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetCAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC — $24,707 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBERRY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER
  • Who funds PAWMETTO LIFELINE
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HEARTWORM PROJECT
  • Who funds HEALING SPECIES INC
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MISSION
  • Who funds S Q Rescue Inc
  • Who funds CAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEWBERRY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seibert Charitable Trust -Trust A(Mff) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph