Skip to content

· Private foundation

Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$55kAnimals$32kHuman Services$16kPhilanthropy$5kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$1kReligion$1kArts & Culture$500
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION$6,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$5,000
ALMOST HEAVEN GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT FOUNDATION$5,000
HEART OF GOLD MINISTRIES$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$510
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ALMOST HEAVEN GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 16%THE LAURANCE JONES III CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE CENTER: $1k → 18%WV WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $15k → 19%HEART OF GOLD MINISTRIES: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $5k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ALMOST HEAVEN GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 16%MANNA MEAL: $544 → 18%WV WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ALMOST HEAVEN GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 16%CHARLESTON BALLET: $500 → 18%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%KANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $6k → 18%KANAWHA CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $6k → 18%KANAWHA CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 35% of Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 42%.

Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 4 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$62k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+16%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +169%
  • AH
    Almost Heaven Golden Retriever Rescue and Sanctuary Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +51%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -3%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • TL
    THE LAURANCE JONES III CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
2
West Virginia Nonprofit Association Inc

The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…

Public Benefit
3
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
4
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation

To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.

—
5
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
6
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
7
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

—
8
West Volusia Humane Society Inc

To provide care and protection, while finding permanent homes for the animals.

Animals
9
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
10
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
11
Central Washington University Foundation

In partnership with cwu and our donors, our mission is to transform the lives of current and future generations of students by developing and stewarding resources that provide access, opportunity, and hope.

—
12
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Almost Heaven Golden Retriever Rescue and Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FO…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCKANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 · AnimalsKANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCI…Almost Heaven Golden Retriever Rescue and Sanctuary Inc: $15,000 · AnimalsAlmost Heaven Golden Retriever R…MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDA…HEART OF GOD MINISTRIES: $1,000 · OtherHEART OF GOD MINIS…THE LAURANCE JONES III CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE CENTER: $1,000 · OtherTHE LAURANCE JONES…+2 more: $1,054 · Other+2 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHARLESTON BALLET INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$55,000Animals$32,000Other$18,054Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC: $544 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON BALLET INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Segal-Davis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph