Skip to content

West Virginia · Private foundation

Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
6
Organizations funded FY2020
33%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$6,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 9
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
3
Total assets, FY2020
$5k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 33% of the organizations Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20206$23k33%
FY20189$34k56%
FY20175$50kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$55kAnimals$32kHuman Services$16kPhilanthropy$5kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$1kReligion$1kArts & Culture$500

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($17k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc

How much does Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc give?
Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc reported 6 grants totaling $22,510 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Education (49%), Animals (29%), Human Services (14%).
Who are Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: West Virginia Wesleyan College ($30k), Kanawha-Charleston Humane Association Inc ($17k), Almost Heaven Golden Retriever Rescue and Sanctuary Inc ($15k).
Does Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc based?
Segal-Davis Family Foundation Inc is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Segal-Davis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph