Skip to content
Seekwell Serves at a glance

· Private foundation

Seekwell Serves

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$245kHuman Services$21kEmployment$16kEducation$15kYouth Development$4kCommunity Improvement$3kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$3,950
Median grant
2
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EYE CARE FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$60,000
TECH-MOMS$16,000
AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES$12,500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) -$10,800
ENCIRCLE$8,485
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
KIDS UNDER THE RADAR$3,950
UTAH ASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$3,000
HERRIMAN CYCLING CLUB$1,500
BRUNSWICK PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GIRL & HER BACKPACK$500
LIONHEART GIFT FOUNDATION$500
THE BRIDGE INSTITUTE OF RECOVERY SCIENCE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KIDS UNDER THE RADAR: $4k → 12%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $13k → 8%LIONHEART GIFT FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%ENCIRCLE: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
2
Skyline Mountain Bike Team Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
GenerationAll

Our Mission is to drastically minimize the generational impact of sexual violence through advocacy and healing by breaking the cycle of generational trauma through advocacy, awareness, and change.

Human Services
4
Nami White Mountains Az

We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…

Health
5
Pchsmtb

Middle and high school MT bike team

—
6
Girls in Stem
Human Services
7
Young Americans Education Foundation
Youth Development
8
Love Relay

Love Relays mission is to support the mental health and well-being of Asian families by reducing stigma, building community connections, and providing culturally responsive resources. Our activities include family workshops, peer support…

Human Services
9
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Salt Lake Roller Derby

Salt Lake Roller Derby provides a home for roller derby in the Salt Lake valley. We are committed to supporting all aspects of roller derby, including officials and athletes, from beginners to nationally ranked competitors.

Recreation & Sports
11
Protect the Groms
Human Services
12
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Asian Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Kids Under the Radar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EYE CARE FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $229,145 · OtherEYE CARE FOR KIDS FOUNDATIONQUIT TRIPN: $15,000 · OtherQUIT TRIPNNational Alliance on Mental Illness Utah: $10,800 · Other+3 more: $2,000 · OtherAmerican Indian Services: $12,500 · Human ServicesAmerican …Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $8,485 · Human ServicesEncircle …Kids Under The Radar: $3,950 · Human ServicesKids Unde…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTech-Moms: $16,000 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthUTAH ASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3,000 · Community ImprovementHERRIMAN CYCLING CLUB INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentBrunswick Partnership for Housing Inc: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$256,945Human Services$25,435Education$16,000Health$5,000Community Improvement$3,000Youth Development$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTech-Moms: $16,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness Utah: $10,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERRIMAN CYCLING CLUB INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBrunswick Partnership for Housing Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seekwell Serves funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seekwell Serves. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seekwell Serves’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home