· Private foundation
Seekwell Serves
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EYE CARE FOR KIDS FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| TECH-MOMS | $16,000 |
| AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES | $12,500 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) - | $10,800 |
| ENCIRCLE | $8,485 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| KIDS UNDER THE RADAR | $3,950 |
| UTAH ASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $3,000 |
| HERRIMAN CYCLING CLUB | $1,500 |
| BRUNSWICK PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| THE BRIDGE INSTITUTE OF RECOVERY SCIENCE | $500 |
| GIRL & HER BACKPACK | $500 |
| LIONHEART GIFT FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Mission is to drastically minimize the generational impact of sexual violence through advocacy and healing by breaking the cycle of generational trauma through advocacy, awareness, and change.
We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…
Middle and high school MT bike team
Love Relays mission is to support the mental health and well-being of Asian families by reducing stigma, building community connections, and providing culturally responsive resources. Our activities include family workshops, peer support…
Salt Lake Roller Derby provides a home for roller derby in the Salt Lake valley. We are committed to supporting all aspects of roller derby, including officials and athletes, from beginners to nationally ranked competitors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Asian Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Kids Under the Radar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tech-Moms ↗
- Who funds American Indian Services ↗
- Who funds National Alliance on Mental Illness Utah ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Kids Under The Radar ↗
- Who funds UTAH ASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds HERRIMAN CYCLING CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Brunswick Partnership for Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds LIONHEART GIFT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seekwell Serves funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.