Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seed Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$875k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$146k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MEducation$1.7MInternational$1.4MHuman Services$224kHealth$146kCivil Rights$102kArts & Culture$80kRecreation & Sports$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $299k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $571k
$35,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERITAGE BAPTIST COALITION$146,436
CABC USA$99,000
WORLD WIDE NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST MISSIONS$80,000
NOSNUMA INTERNATIONAL$72,000
CITYLIGHT BIBLE CHURCH$69,036
CHESTER COUNTY CONNECTCARE$55,000
GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATION$50,000
FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH$45,000
GLOBAL BAPTIST MISSION$42,400
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH LANDSDALE$35,000
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC$32,000
HIDDEN TREASURE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$25,000
BAPTIST WORLD MISSION$24,866
TRI-STATE BIBLE CAMP$24,092
PACIFIC RIM MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL$20,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%58TEN: $115k → 6%CHESTER COUNTY CONNECTCARE: $55k → 6%BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $26k → 6%BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 6%BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Seed Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 16%.

Seed Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 31 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
23

Total granted

$6.7M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

35%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $314k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    The Heritage Baptist Coalition
    5× · 2019–2024 · $802k · revenue +183% · 27% of their budget
  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $736k · revenue +16%
  • FB
    Faith Baptist Bible College
    4× · 2017–2021 · $649k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • FB
    FAITH BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE & THEOLOGICAL
    one grant, 2022 · $175k
  • OI
    OREMUNDO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -66% · 37% of their budget
  • 5I
    58TEN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $115k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Europe Campus Ministry

The Organization is formed for Christian evangelism and discipleship training as afundamentalist, evangelical, and non-denominational faith-based missionorganization. Its mission is to reach out to students with the whole of gospel ofJesus…

Religion
2
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
3
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
4
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
5
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
6
Born Again Body Incdba Bueno Amigos

Missionary ministry to foreign countries

—
7
Kardo International Ministries

Biblical instruction

Education
8
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
9
International Church Missions

Proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ evangelism discipleship and church planting

International
10
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
11
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
12
International Chapel Ministries

Evangelize japanese by establishing chapels, home bible studies, training and production of literature for free distribution.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist International Evangelistic Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chester County Connect Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $360,816 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPACIFIC RIM MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $262,300 · OtherPACIFIC RIM MISSIONS INTERNATIONALWORLDVIEW MINISTRIES: $224,900 · OtherWORLDVIEW MINISTRIESTRI-STATE BIBLE CAMP: $181,692 · OtherCHINA VISION: $180,000 · OtherFAITH BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE & THEOLOGICAL: $175,000 · OtherBAPTISTS EQUIPPING NATIONALS: $151,000 · OtherANTIOCH BAPTIST CHURCH: $143,000 · OtherCALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH LANDSDALE: $135,000 · OtherBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $121,000 · Other+34 more: $1,617,403 · Other+34 moreINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC: $736,160 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PARTNE…NOSNUMA INTERNATIONAL: $693,500 · InternationalNOSNUMA INTERNATIONA…Faith Baptist Bible College: $648,813 · EducationFaith Baptist Bible…SOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $591,500 · EducationSOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN…OREMUNDO INC: $120,000 · EducationOREMUNDO INC+1 more: $7,000 · EducationThe Heritage Baptist Coalition: $802,436 · ReligionThe Heritage Bapti…EURASIAN BAPTIST MISSION: $404,714 · ReligionEURASIAN BAPTIST M…+4 more: $120,000 · Religion+4 more58TEN INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $66,165 · Human ServicesCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $55,000 · Human ServicesKINGDOM AIR CORPS: $65,000 · Arts & CultureCOUNTY CORRECTIONS GOSPEL MISSION: $57,309 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,552,111International$1,429,660Education$1,367,313Religion$1,327,150Human Services$236,165Arts & Culture$65,000Crime & Legal$57,309

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Heritage Baptist Coalition: $802,436 over 5y, 27% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC: $736,160 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetNOSNUMA INTERNATIONAL: $693,500 over 8y, 28% of budgetFaith Baptist Bible College: $648,813 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetSOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $591,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetEURASIAN BAPTIST MISSION: $404,714 over 7y, 22% of budgetBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $121,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetOREMUNDO INC: $120,000 over 1y, 37% of budget58TEN INC: $115,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetBRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $66,165 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetKINGDOM AIR CORPS: $65,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCOUNTY CORRECTIONS GOSPEL MISSION: $57,309 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $55,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBIBLE VISUALS INTERNATIONAL INC: $54,684 over 2y, 11% of budgetREMEMBER: $39,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFRONTLINE MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCABC USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Heritage Baptist Coalition ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NOSNUMA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Faith Baptist Bible College ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EURASIAN BAPTIST MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OREMUNDO INC ↗
  • Who funds 58TEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM AIR CORPS ↗
  • Who funds COUNTY CORRECTIONS GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE VISUALS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cornerstone FoundationPA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cornerstone Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Inspiration Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · P & B Foundation · The Melvin and Virginia Hutson Foundation · John Calvin Bible Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seed Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Seed Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph