Skip to content
Security Health Plan of Wisconsin Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Security Health Plan of Wisconsin Inc

Security health plan's mission is to enrich lives to help consumers and communities reach their best health by ensuring access to affordable and high quality health insurance.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MEducation$159kRecreation & Sports$120kHuman Services$48kYouth Development$23kMembership Benefit$15kEmployment$8k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $50,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$394M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Univ of WI - Stevens Point Foundation Inc: $16k → 10%Chippewa County Department of Public Health: $15k → 10%Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging: $28k → 10%Bayfield County Health Department: $21k → 11%DC EVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $331k → 11%Lincoln County Health Department: $25k → 11%Taylor County Drug Opposition Partners: $10k → 11%School District of Tigerton: $6k → 11%Eau Claire Area School District: $42k → 12%Oneida County Health Department: $46k → 12%School District of Phillips: $40k → 12%Barron County Community Coalition: $25k → 13%Together for Jackson County: $13k → 13%Clark County Public Health Department: $10k → 13%Indianhead Community Action Agency: $25k → 13%Northwest Wisconsin CEP: $8k → 14%Couleecap Inc: $15k → 15%Sawyer County Public Health: $5k → 15%Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging Inc: $14k → 10%Bayfield County Health Department: $12k → 11%DC EVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $70k → 11%Wisconsin Health Literacy: $30k → 12%Community Connections To Prosperity of Barron Cnty: $38k → 13%Wisconsin Health Literacy: $51k → 10%DC EVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 11%Marshfield Area YMCA Inc: $30k → 11%Feed My People Food Bank: $25k → 12%Wisconsin Health Literacy: $41k → 10%Big Brothers Big Sisters: $10k → 11%MARSHFIELD AREA YMCA: $19k → 11%Eau Claire City-County Health Department: $15k → 12%WISCONSIN HEALTH LITERACY: $26k → 10%MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION: $135k → 11%Marshfield Area YMCA: $18k → 11%MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION: $135k → 11%MARSHFIELD AREA YMCA: $10k → 11%MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION: $135k → 11%Wood County Health Department: $30k → 11%Marathon County Special Education: $130k → 11%Marathon County Special Education: $125k → 11%Marathon County Special Education: $125k → 11%MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION: $50k → 11%Newman Catholic Schools: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 6 repeat orgs$859k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
25

Total granted

$1.2M
$859k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+21%

Still filing today

50%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthMembership BenefitEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $834k
  • WL
    WISCONSIN LITERACY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $148k · revenue +337%
  • DS
    DCEVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $91k

Funded once

  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2018 · $331k · revenue -44%
  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +219%
  • AO
    ADRC OF ONEIDA COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
2
Northwest Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board Inc

The northwest wisconsin workforce investment board (nwwib) will create, and continue to improve, an innovative and quality strategic direction for the regional workforce development system.

Public Benefit
3
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
4
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education
5
Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Inc

Founded in 1911, our mission is to make wisconsin the most competitive state in the nation to do business. we are wisconsin's business voice.

—
6
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
7
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
8
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
9
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

—
10
Dickinson County Healthcare System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
11
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northcentral Wisconsin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION: $834,140 · OtherMARATHON COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATIONWISCONSIN LITERACY INC: $147,537 · OtherWISCONSIN LITERACY INCDCEVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICT: $91,000 · OtherDCEVEREST SCHOOL DISTRICTMARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC: $76,000 · Other+21 more: $452,765 · Other+21 moreMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $331,010 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC INCMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $70,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH…WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHY AGING INC: $42,400 · HealthWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR …UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $16,250 · EducationCOULEECAP INC: $15,000 · Membership BenefitNORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONCENTRATED EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM INC: $7,500 · Employment
Other$1,601,442Health$443,410Education$16,250Membership Benefit$15,000Employment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $331,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN LITERACY INC: $147,537 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC: $76,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHY AGING INC: $42,400 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $16,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOULEECAP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Northcentral Wisconsin Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONCENTRATED EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHY AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COULEECAP INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northcentral Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONCENTRATED EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Wisconsin Age…Marshfield Clinic Hea…Green Bay Packers Fou…Otto Bremer TrustThe Medical College o…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Eau Claire Community …United Way of the Gre…Children's Hospital o…The Macdonald Foundat…National Council on A…Herbert H Kohl Charit…
Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources IncWI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources Inc · Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Eau Claire Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc · Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc · The Macdonald Foundation · National Council on Aging Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Security Health Plan of Wisconsin Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Security Health Plan of Wisconsin Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Security Health Plan of Wisconsin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home