Skip to content

· Public charity

Second Chance Shop

The mission of second chance thrift shop is to generate funds through the sale of donated items.

$257k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$328kHousing & Shelter$173kCrime & Legal$172kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$28kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $212,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $256,626 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,626 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS OF SUMMERVILLE INC$50,000
KEYS TO CHANGE$45,000
DOORS TO FREEDOM$45,000
KATIE'S KROPS$25,000
EXPANDING THE TABLE$20,000
HEARTS FOR SUMMERVILLE$15,000
DORCHESTER SENIORS INC$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DORCHESTER SENIORS INC: $12k → 11%DORCHESTER SENIORS INC: $10k → 11%MAGDAENE HOUSE OF CHARLESTON: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$722k · 7 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$722k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+22%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF SUMMERVILLE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $206k · revenue +89%
  • DC
    DORCHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY OUTREACH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $173k · revenue +313%
  • DT
    DOORS TO FREEDOM
    4× · 2022–2025 · $172k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • HO
    HELP OF SUMMERVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue +22% · 33% of their budget
  • MH
    MAGDALENE HOUSE OF CHARLESTON
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Somerset County Inc

Providing meals to the elderly and needy

Food & Nutrition
2
Summersville Senior Center

Serving older individuals

—
3
Davenport Senior Citizens

Meals for elderly

Human Services
4
Meal a Day

Provide 115+ local shut-in seniors with hot lunches 5 days a week

Food & Nutrition
5
Southeast Grayson Senior Center

Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.

Human Services
6
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
7
Delivering and Servicing the Homebo

Food to poor and elderly

—
8
The People Who Care Food Cupboard

The mission of the food cupboard is to nourish and feed those in our community who are unable to do so on their own primarily due to limited financial resources.

Food & Nutrition
9
Somerset Commission on Aging

Provide transportation and meals and additional assistance to elderly

Human Services
10
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
11
House of Hope North Charleston

To reduce hunger and poverty in the Tri-County Area by providing individuals and families with food, clothing, shelter, resource and spiritual support while striving to employ, educate and empower.

Food & Nutrition
12
Mason Senior Citizen Center

To delivery hot meals to those unable to leave their homes. we also assist with rent and utlitilies to families in need.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dorchester County Community Outreach; the most unlike its peers is Katie's Krops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS OF SUMMERVILLE INC: $206,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF SUMMERVILLE INCKATIE'S KROPS: $89,000 · Food & NutritionKATIE'S KROPSEXPANDING THE TABLE: $32,500 · Food & NutritionEXPANDING THE TABLEDORCHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $173,000 · Housing & ShelterDORCHESTER COUNTY COMMUNI…DOORS TO FREEDOM: $172,000 · Crime & LegalDOORS TO FREEDOMHELP OF SUMMERVILLE: $28,000 · OtherHEARTS FOR SUMMERVILLE: $27,500 · OtherDORCHESTER SENIORS INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesMAGDALENE HOUSE OF CHARLESTON: $10,000 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$327,500Housing & Shelter$173,000Crime & Legal$172,000Other$55,500Human Services$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SUMMERVILLE INC: $206,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetDORCHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $173,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetDOORS TO FREEDOM: $172,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetKATIE'S KROPS: $89,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetEXPANDING THE TABLE: $32,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetHELP OF SUMMERVILLE: $28,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetDORCHESTER SENIORS INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAGDALENE HOUSE OF CHARLESTON: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Second Chance Shop funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Second Chance Shop. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Second Chance Shop?

    Find your warmest path to Second Chance Shop through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Second Chance Shop’s filings →

    More from the funding graph