Skip to content

South Carolina · Public charity

Second Chance Shop

The mission of second chance thrift shop is to generate funds through the sale of donated items. Generated funds are then distributed to local nonprofit organizations.

$257k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$212k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 8
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$436k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Second Chance Shop funded were first-time grantees, receiving 21% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$212k0%
FY20248$210k50%
FY20234$180k0%
FY20225$158kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$328kHousing & Shelter$173kCrime & Legal$172kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$28kHealth$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Meals on Wheels of Summerville Inc$206,000420%
Dorchester County Community Outreach$173,000414%
Doors to Freedom$172,00044%
Katie's Krops$89,00048%
Expanding the Table$32,500218%
Help of Summerville$28,000133%
Hearts for Summerville$27,5002n/a
Dorchester Seniors Inc$22,00020%
Magdalene House of Charleston$10,00018%

Where it is load-bearing

Second Chance Shop supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMeals on Wheels of Summerville Inc: $206,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetDorchester County Community Outreach: $173,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetDoors to Freedom: $172,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetKatie's Krops: $89,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetExpanding the Table: $32,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetHelp of Summerville: $28,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetDorchester Seniors Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMagdalene House of Charleston: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Second Chance Shop with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Second Chance Shop?

Find your warmest path to Second Chance Shop through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Second Chance Shop

How much does Second Chance Shop give?
Second Chance Shop reported 7 itemized grants totaling $212,000, out of $256,626 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 8 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Second Chance Shop fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (43%), Housing & Shelter (23%), Crime & Legal (23%).
Who are Second Chance Shop's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Meals on Wheels of Summerville Inc ($206k), Dorchester County Community Outreach ($173k), Doors to Freedom ($172k).
Does Second Chance Shop fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Second Chance Shop?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Second Chance Shop based?
Second Chance Shop is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Second Chance Shop’s filings →

More from the funding graph