Skip to content
Seattle Rotary Service Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Seattle Rotary Service Foundation

The mission of the SEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION is to raise, steward, and distribute funds in support of the service activities of the rotary club of seattle.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$502kYouth Development$316kEducation$254kCommunity Improvement$166kFood & Nutrition$165kHousing & Shelter$117kHuman Services$101kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $192,202, the rows itemized in this filing. The $235,095 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,893 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPLIFT NORTHWEST$75,000
SCHOOL CONNECT WA$30,000
ROTARY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$23,402
HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER$16,000
5TH AVENUE THEATRE$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KING CTY$12,800
UW CONSULTING & BUS DEV$10,000
ETTA PROJECTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Stove Team International: $21k → 15%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 10%CENTS CONSUMER ED & TRAINING: $10k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $75k → 9%Wellspring Family Services: $20k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 9%Wellspring Family Services: $8k → 9%Pioneer Human Services: $25k → 9%REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE: $20k → 9%SIDR Foundation: $6k → 9%Lutheran Community Services: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
CA
CO
DC
OK

Grants abroad, by region: $29k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Zambia$19k · 66% · 1 grant
Uganda$10k · 34% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RUBONGI DEV FUND

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$679k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
33

Total granted

$1.2M
$549k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+15%

Still filing today

87%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +38%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $167k · revenue +74%
  • PH
    PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
    2× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • PP
    PIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ASPEN ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $63k · revenue +4%
  • DS
    DOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue ×307 · 35% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
2
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
3
Foundation for International Understanding Through

FIUTS connects university students with local and global communities through cross-cultural experiences, student leadership, and community connections.

International
4
Rotary Foundation of the South Puget Sound Rotary Club
Education
5
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
6
Global Visionaries

Global visionaries invites youth from diverse socio-economic, racial, and ethnic backgrounds to be active leaders in their local and global communities. fostering leadership skills grounded in environmental and social justice.

Youth Development
7
Seattle International Soccer Local Organizing Committee

Seattle international soccer local organizing committee exists to use the incredible platform of soccer (including the 2026 fifa world cup(tm)) to enrich and enhance the lives of everyone who visits or lives in the state of washington and…

Community Improvement
8
Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…

Health
9
The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust

The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust leads and inspires action to conserve and enhance the landscape of the Mountains to Sound Greenway, ensuring a long-term balance between people and nature.

Environment
10
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
11
Rotary Club of Seattle

The rotary club of seattle creates strong relationships, increases understanding, and serves critical community needs.

—
12
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sahar Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
29/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER: $121,000 · OtherHARVEST AGAINST HUNGERROTARY INTERNATIONAL ASPEN ROTARY CLUB: $63,448 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL ASPEN ROT…ROTARY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $62,705 · OtherROTARY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSeattle Children's Foundation: $33,100 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $20,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $50,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUB…+18 more: $199,821 · Other+18 moreMalaria Partners International: $303,302 · InternationalMalaria Partners Inte…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $44,568 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION…COMMON THREADS PROJECT: $14,500 · International+3 more: $24,000 · International+3 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $301,103 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS C…UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $75,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWES…WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $42,610 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING FAMI…SHELTERBOX USA INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA …PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC: $24,810 · Human ServicesPIONEER HUMAN S…STOVETEAM INTERNATIONAL: $21,000 · Human ServicesSTOVETEAM INTER…Refugee Womens Alliance: $20,000 · Human ServicesRefugee Womens …Everstrong Prevention: $15,000 · Human ServicesEverstrong Prev…SEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Human ServicesLutheran Community Services Northwest: $12,000 · Human ServicesFEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $10,000 · Human ServicesConsumer Education and Training Services: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $167,400 · EducationUNITED NEGRO …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $38,110 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…SCHOOL CONNECT WA: $30,000 · EducationSCHOOL CONNEC…+1 more: $6,550 · EducationPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARES: $35,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCULTIVATE SOUTH PARK: $10,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,250 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyURBAN ARTWORKS: $20,000 · PhilanthropySammamish Rotary Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBURIENWHITE CENTER ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$550,074International$386,370Recreation & Sports$301,103Human Services$277,420Education$242,060Community Improvement$160,250Philanthropy$136,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMalaria Partners International: $303,302 over 3y, 21% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $301,103 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $167,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST AGAINST HUNGER: $121,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL ASPEN ROTARY CLUB: $63,448 over 1y, 19% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $44,568 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $42,610 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $38,110 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARES: $35,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $33,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL CONNECT WA: $30,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC: $24,810 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOVETEAM INTERNATIONAL: $21,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetRefugee Womens Alliance: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ARTWORKS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SEATTLE: $17,765 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSEATTLE AGAINST SLAVERY: $16,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $16,263 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEverstrong Prevention: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budget5TH AVENUE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMWANZO: $14,580 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMON THREADS PROJECT: $14,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSEATTLE-INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAPROOT THEATRE: $10,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetETTA Projects: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSammamish Rotary Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetFEDERAL WAY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetRVC SEATTLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCULTIVATE SOUTH PARK: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetConsumer Education and Training Services: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNORTHWEST MARITIME CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bhutan Foundation: $8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAHAR EDUCATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $6,989 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,874 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOOSE 180: $6,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMAGINE SCHOLAR INC: $6,550 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBURIENWHITE CENTER ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetWALL OF HOPE: $6,000 over 1y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…The Norcliffe Foundat…Lucky Seven FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…M J Murdock Charitabl…Grousemont FoundationMoccasin Lake Foundat…School's Out Washingt…Gates FoundationMedina FoundationRaikes Foundation
Seattle FoundationWA32.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Grousemont Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · School's Out Washington · Gates Foundation · Medina Foundation · Raikes Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seattle Rotary Service Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seattle Rotary Service Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seattle Rotary Service’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home