Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seaman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$626kReligion$413kArts & Culture$90kPublic Benefit$50kScience & Tech$40kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$8kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,800
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHEB ZEDEK CEDAR SINAI SYNAGOGUE$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND$35,000
STAND WITH US$25,000
ASU$25,000
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA$10,000
CENTAL FUND OF ISRAEL SHURAT HADIN$10,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC$10,000
FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC$5,000
MICHAEL LEVIN LONE SOLIDER$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS$2,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$2,500
ZAKA$1,800
DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $180) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $180 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$1.2M
$281k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
0%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $163k · revenue +91%
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $90k · revenue +91%
  • ZO
    ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • ID
    Internet Development Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -79%
  • MM
    MERCL Middle East Research Center Ltd
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST RESEARCH CENTER LTD
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
3
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
6
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
7
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
8
Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
11
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
12
Israel Policy Forum Inc

Israel policy forum's mission is to build support for u.s. policies that help to advance a resolution to the israeli-palestinian conflict based on two states that would advance american interests and ensure israel's future as a secure,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Meir Panim; the most unlike its peers is Internet Development Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND: $190,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUNDOHEB ZEDEK-CEDAR SINAI SYNAGOGUE: $170,000 · OtherOHEB ZEDEK-CEDAR SINAI SYNAGOGUEASU: $160,000 · OtherASUCWRU: $70,000 · OtherCWRUMERCL Middle East Research Center Ltd: $40,000 · OtherCENTAL FUND OF ISRAEL SHURAT HADIN: $30,000 · Other+26 more: $196,380 · Other+26 moreAmerican Friends of Kedumim Inc: $194,905 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Kedumim IncISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $163,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCEFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INCAMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INCFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $90,000 · ReligionFRIENDSHI…ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $35,000 · ReligionZIONIST O…+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionInternet Development Fund: $50,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $250 · Public BenefitHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $180 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $180 · Human Services
Other$856,380International$410,905Religion$126,000Public Benefit$50,250Arts & Culture$30,000Education$2,680Human Services$2,680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Kedumim Inc: $194,905 over 7y, 78% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $163,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $90,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetInternet Development Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMIDDLE EAST RESEARCH CENTER LTD: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetAMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF HONOR INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTAGE ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Friends of Kedumim Inc ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Internet Development Fund ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST RESEARCH CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seaman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seaman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seaman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Seaman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seaman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph