Skip to content

· Public charity

Sea Change Incorporated

To support societal innovation and betterment by education and supporting individuals and organizations in the area of social entrepreneurship.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$122kArts & Culture$102kEducation$86kYouth Development$73kEnvironment$66kFood & Nutrition$44kCommunity Improvement$35kHuman Services$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $103,557, the rows itemized in this filing. The $171,691 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,134 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$6,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fort Buffalo$17,500
We Hate Exercise$11,250
Mecca Beverage Group$9,160
Saidah Farrell$8,635
Makerspace Central$7,850
Hands on Health$7,500
Raise the Bar LLC$6,250
The Garden District Corp$6,112
ITI Assistive Technologies$6,000
Fit after Pink$6,000
Freedom Pipeline LLC$6,000
CHAT Express$5,800
Alive on Purpose$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POINT GLOBAL: $18k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$511k · 23 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against -68% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$511k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
-68%

Still filing today

30%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DAY BY DAY PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +125%
  • FL
    Food Leads Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $26k · revenue +96%
  • FP
    FORM5 PROSTHETICS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +273%

Funded once

  • PG
    Point Global
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue -92%
  • BL
    BONIFIER LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • P
    PHILANTHROPITCH
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Propel Productions Center

Propel Productions Center's mission is to Create Change! by developing an array of emotional wellness programs, products, services, and experiences that engage, educate, and empower entrepreneurs.

Human Services
2
Motiv8 Dance Movement and Performing Arts
Arts & Culture
3
Women Enabled Enterprises

Women Enabled Enterprises strives to help low income women of color artisans in African countries grow their craft business for self-sufficiency through a virtual, mobile-phone based, retail entrepreneurship skills building program, access…

Human Services
4
Leap Personal Finance

Leap provides personalized financial empowerment programs tailored for expectant parents and parents of young children, including budgeting tools, mini-lessons, webinars, and support from financial experts.

Public Benefit
5
Lucky Project

Lucky Project's mission is to show the world the value of individuals with disabilities who are developing the fundamentals to help create full meaningful lives.

Human Services
6
Touchpointe for Youth

Promote activities impacting youths

Youth Development
7
A Purposeful Day

Empower individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities by providing them with a sense of daily purpose

Human Services
8
Herhealtheq Corp

Delivering devices and equipment to mid-to-low income countries, to target the prevention and detection of non-communicable diseases. This is specifically focused on impacting the lives of women.

International
9
Pul Alliance for Digital Health and Equity Inc

According to the World Health Organization, half of the worlds 8 billion people still cannot access essential health services. Even for those who can, the costs are often cripplingly high. NGOs delivering health and humanitarian aid to…

Community Improvement
10
ECatalyst

To transform developing communities through their entrepreneurs

Community Improvement
11
The Lovey Project Inc
Human Services
12
Flywheel Social Enterprise Hub

Through workshops, training programs and technical assistance, we help social entrepreneurs build ventures that deliver social impact.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Side Learning & Development Center; the most unlike its peers is Motivate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SUSTAINERY: $35,000 · OtherTHE SUSTAINERYFort Buffalo: $35,000 · OtherFort BuffaloTHE MILK MISSION: $35,000 · OtherTHE MILK MISSIONSoundbender Institute: $29,280 · OtherSoundbender InstituteBust A Move: $25,000 · OtherTogether We Compost: $25,000 · OtherRela Art: $25,000 · OtherDigi Doula Inc: $24,000 · OtherPosh Teatime Co: $22,000 · OtherWe Hate Exercise: $21,067 · OtherMelanated Millennial: $21,000 · OtherCITA Social Enterprises: $20,000 · Other+22 more: $186,426 · Other+22 moreDAY BY DAY PROJECT: $35,000 · HealthDAY BY DAY PROJE…Food Leads Inc: $26,049 · HealthFood Leads IncFORM5 PROSTHETICS INC: $20,000 · HealthFORM5 PROSTHETIC…The Superhero Project: $12,000 · HealthThe Superhero Pr…ALIVE ON PURPOSE: $5,500 · HealthALIVE ON PURPOSEHands-On Health: $16,370 · EducationEDITH INSTITUTE: $14,000 · EducationMakerspace Central: $7,850 · EducationPoint Global: $18,450 · Human Services
Other$503,773Health$98,549Education$38,220Human Services$18,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAY BY DAY PROJECT: $35,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetFood Leads Inc: $26,049 over 2y, 21% of budgetFORM5 PROSTHETICS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHands-On Health: $16,370 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetWhole Latte Love Cafe Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetEDITH INSTITUTE: $14,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetThe Superhero Project: $12,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMakerspace Central: $7,850 over 1y, 11% of budgetPHILANTHROPITCH: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH SIDE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAY BY DAY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Food Leads Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORM5 PROSTHETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Point Global ↗
  • Who funds Hands-On Health ↗
  • Who funds Whole Latte Love Cafe Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDITH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Superhero Project ↗
  • Who funds Makerspace Central ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPITCH ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SIDE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH13.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sea Change Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sea Change Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sea Change Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Sea Change Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sea Change’s filings →

    More from the funding graph