Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Scottsdale Arts

To create arts in diverse experiences that engage the community though the development of new and exciting cultural initiatives for the community; the encouragement of active participation and cooperation of the government, business, education and (continued on schedule o) private sectors; and the providing of quality management,…

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.6MYouth Development$140kHuman Services$106kHealth$30kCrime & Legal$26kPhilanthropy$14k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $132,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $151,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDS IN FOCUS$10,000
THE WALTER HIVE$10,000
ARIZONA MUSICFEST$10,000
CHILDSPLAY INC$10,000
GREASEPAINT YOUTH THEATER$10,000
SCOTTSDALE ARTISTS' SCHOOL INC$10,000
ACT ONE ARIZONA$8,500
CENTRAL ARIZONA FLUTE ENSEMBLE$8,000
DETOUR COMPANY THEATRE$7,500
B3 THEATRE INC$7,500
DESERT FOOTHILLS EVENTS$7,500
FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION$7,500
YES AND PRODUCTIONS$6,500
MOVEMENT SOURCE INC$6,500
THE BRIDGE INITIATIVE$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DETOUR COMPANY THEATRE: $10k → 11%DETOUR COMPANY THEATRE: $10k → 11%DETOUR COMPANY THEATRE: $10k → 11%DETOUR COMPANY THEATRE: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING AND REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING AND REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING AND REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$598k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$1.3M
$560k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SCOTTSDALE ARTISTS' SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $314k · revenue +8%
  • DC
    DETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +8%
  • SP
    SCOTTSDALE PHILHARMONIC INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $104k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • SM
    SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -35%
  • SH
    SCOTTSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • OT
    OLD TOWN SCOTTSDALE RODEO MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scottsdale Arts

To create arts in diverse experiences that engage the community though the development of new and exciting cultural initiatives for the community; the encouragement of active participation and cooperation of the government, business,…

Arts & Culture
2
Phoenix Performing Arts Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Southwest Shakespeare Company Inc

Theatre company to educate and entertain through performances of works of classical theatre

Arts & Culture
4
Stray Cat Theatre

Decidedly off the beaten path, Stray Cat is indie theatre at its best: quirky, edgy and irreverent. Stray Cat Theatre scratches the Valley's itch for a visceral, provocative theatre experience for culture-savvy cats who crave something…

5
Sedona Symphony

The Sedona Symphony is committed to enriching the quality of life of our Northern Arizona community through the power of live orchestral music that educates, entertains, and inspires. From timeless classics to bold contemporary works, the…

Arts & Culture
6
Triad Performing Arts of Arizona

Our mission is to provide a truly unique performing arts experience to the West Valley. Through high quality productions in the areas of music, dance, and theatre, we can empower artists of all ages to pursue their dreams in the performing…

Arts & Culture
7
Four Seasons Orchestra

The four seasons orchestra offers classical music to the general public. the orchestra has performed chamber music and concerts at various venues, including asus kerr cultural center.

Arts & Culture
8
Arizona Theater Matters

Arizona Theatre Matters (ATM) shapes theatre from the substance of accessibility itself, ensuring storytelling reaches everyoneregardless of ability, income, or location. By making accessibility an artistic foundation, we create theatre…

Arts & Culture
9
Southern Arizona Performing Arts Company

Southern Arizona Performing Arts Company (SAPAC) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization of unified local artists committed to bringing high-quality theatrical performance to the Tucson area. We believe in the power theater has to entertain,…

Arts & Culture
10
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
11
Promusica Arizona Chorale & Orchestra

ProMusica Arizona enriches lives in the Greater Phoenix area, with focus on the North Valley, through innovative, joint performances of its multigenerational Chorale and Orchestra.

Arts & Culture
12
Fine Arts Association of Arizonia

Raise awareness on Indian Classical performing arts by conducting workshops lecture demostrations and presenting concerts that is open to all audience

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Symphony Association and the most unlike its peers is Don Bluth Front Row Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts Organizatio…Children's Health and Welln…Family Support & Crisis Ser…Disability & Behavioral Hea…Community Arts & Cultural O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%3%<5yr17%17%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr10%23%35–55yr10%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%1%<5yr17%3%5–10yr20%46%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr10%33%35–55yr10%3%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
17%
2,923/17,015

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureSCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INCSCOTTSDALE ARTISTS' SCHOOL INC — $314,065 · Arts & CultureSCOTTSDALE ARTISTS' SCHOOL INCSCOTTSDALE PHILHARMONIC INC — $104,200 · Arts & CultureSCOTTSDALE PHILHARMONIC INCARIZONA MUSICFEST INC — $97,453 · Arts & CultureARIZONA MUSICFEST INCCHILDSPLAY INC — $69,500 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $218,715 · Arts & Culture+16 moreScottsdale International Film Festival Inc — $135,300 · OtherScottsdale Interna…GREASEPAINT YOUTHEATRE — $80,274 · OtherGREASEPAINT YOUTHE…MOVEMENT SOURCE INC — $30,500 · OtherMOVEMENT SOURCE IN…SCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PLAYERS — $20,000 · OtherSCOTTSDALE COMMUNI…SCOTTSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $10,500 · Other+6 more — $34,490 · Other+6 moreDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC — $106,150 · Human ServicesSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC — $29,750 · Human ServicesKids in Focus — $52,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOOTHILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $42,750 · PhilanthropyTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION — $41,000 · EducationFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF ARIZONA — $25,730 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$1,303,933Other$311,064Human Services$135,900Youth Development$52,000Philanthropy$42,750Education$41,000Crime & Legal$25,730

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC — $500,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSCOTTSDALE ARTISTS' SCHOOL INC — $314,065 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetScottsdale International Film Festival Inc — $135,300 over 5y, 61% of budgetDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC — $106,150 over 9y, 16% of budgetSCOTTSDALE PHILHARMONIC INC — $104,200 over 6y, 13% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC — $97,453 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetCHILDSPLAY INC — $69,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetKids in Focus — $52,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetDesert Stages Inc — $43,404 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFOOTHILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $42,750 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $40,900 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC — $29,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF ARIZONA — $25,730 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDON BLUTH FRONT ROW THEATRE — $20,911 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PLAYERS — $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACT ONE — $18,250 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $16,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetArizona Theatre Company — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAZZ IN ARIZONA INC — $6,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMusica Nova Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetIRANIAN AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ARIZONA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetRISING YOUTH THEATRE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCATTLE TRACK ARTS AND PRESERVATION — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetScottsdale Gallery Association — $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSCOTTSDALE BALLET FOUNDATION — $810 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ42.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Thunderbirds Charities · Scottsdale League for the Arts · The Herberger Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Steele Foundation Inc · Livingston Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Silverman Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scottsdale Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph