Skip to content
Scottish Rite Foundation of Missouri Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Scottish Rite Foundation of Missouri Inc

It is the mission of the scottish rite foundation of missouri, inc.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$322kHealth$299kPhilanthropy$126kEducation$87kArts & Culture$79kPublic Safety & Disaster$50k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $120,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $151,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY$40,300
RITECARE VALLEY OF COLUMBIA$30,000
VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE$20,000
ST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATION$20,000
WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC AT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY: $40k → 5%Missouri Demolay (Demolay International): $60k → 11%VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $21k → 15%SRKC GIVING: $21k → 15%RITECARE VALLEY OF COLUMBIA: $30k → 17%St Joseph Scottish Rite Masonic Center Preservation Association: $43k → 18%Walker Scottish Rite Clinic for Childhood Language: $19k → 21%MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY: $33k → 5%Missouri Demolay (Demolay International): $60k → 11%VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $20k → 15%Scottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders Clinic: $16k → 15%RITECARE VALLEY OF COLUMBIA: $18k → 17%ST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%Walker Scottish Rite Clinic for Childhood Language: $17k → 21%MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY: $30k → 5%Missouri Demolay (Demolay International): $47k → 11%VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $17k → 15%Scottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders Clinic: $16k → 15%Valley of Columbia Ritecare: $16k → 17%St Joseph Scottish Rite Masonic Center Preservation Association: $14k → 18%WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR: $17k → 21%MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY: $20k → 5%Missouri Demolay (Demolay International): $43k → 11%VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $10k → 15%Scottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders Clinic: $15k → 15%Valley of Columbia Ritecare: $15k → 17%ST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%Walker Scottish Rite Clinic for Childhood Language: $17k → 21%MISSOURI DEMOLAY (DEMOLAY: $30k → 11%SRKC GIVING: $15k → 15%Valley of Columbia Ritecare: $15k → 17%AASR Valley of St Joseph: $10k → 18%Walker Scottish Rite Clinic for Childhood Language: $13k → 21%WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC AT: $21k → 11%SCOTTISH RITE CILDHOOD LANGUAGE: $15k → 15%VALLEY OF COLUMBIA RITECARE: $15k → 17%ST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATION: $7k → 18%AASR Valley of St Louis: $10k → 21%WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC AT: $17k → 11%Scottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders Clinic: $12k → 15%RITECARE VALLEY OF COLUMBIA: $12k → 17%St Joseph Scottish Rite Masonic Center Preservation Association: $7k → 18%WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC AT: $10k → 11%SRKC GIVING: $10k → 15%Valley of Columbia Ritecare: $12k → 17%WALKER SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC AT: $10k → 11%AASR Valley of Kansas City: $10k → 15%AASR Valley of Columbia: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DeMolay International 26999 Missouri At Large Chapter
    9× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +111% · 60% of their budget
  • SR
    SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS OF ST LOUIS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $93k · revenue +415% · 45% of their budget
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC CTR
    5× · 2017–2021 · $89k · revenue +421% · 89% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    DeMolay International 26999 Missouri At Large Chapter: $362,713 · OtherDeMolay International 26999 Missouri At Large ChapterScottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders Clinic: $84,961 · OtherScottish Rite Childhood Language Disorders ClinicSRKC GIVING: $46,495 · OtherSRKC GIVINGST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATION: $43,207 · OtherST JOSEPH VALLEY FOUNDATIONRitecare Valley of Columbia Inc: $150,096 · HealthRitecare Valley of Columb…SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS OF ST LOUIS INC: $92,746 · HealthSCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR …VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $156,048 · PhilanthropyVALLEY OF JOPLIN…ST JOSEPH SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC CTR: $88,882 · Arts & CultureST JOSEPH…Maryville University - St Louis: $58,202 · Education
    Other$537,376Health$242,842Philanthropy$156,048Arts & Culture$88,882Education$58,202

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDeMolay International 26999 Missouri At Large Chapter: $362,713 over 9y, 60% of budgetVALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE: $156,048 over 9y, 33% of budgetRitecare Valley of Columbia Inc: $150,096 over 9y, 74% of budgetSCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS OF ST LOUIS INC: $92,746 over 5y, 45% of budgetST JOSEPH SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC CTR: $88,882 over 5y, 89% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $58,202 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSRKC GIVING: $46,495 over 3y, 24% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds DeMolay International 26999 Missouri At Large Chapter ↗
    • Who funds VALLEY OF JOPLIN SCOTTISH RITE CARE ↗
    • Who funds Ritecare Valley of Columbia Inc ↗
    • Who funds SCOTTISH RITE CLINIC FOR CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS OF ST LOUIS INC ↗
    • Who funds ST JOSEPH SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC CTR ↗
    • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
    • Who funds SRKC GIVING ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile Foundation
    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Scottish Rite Foundation of Missouri Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scottish Rite Foundation of Missouri Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Scottish Rite Foundation of Missouri’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home