Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scott R Wheaton Foundation Co Regions Bank

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Recreation & Sports$18kPhilanthropy$9kEducation$6kAnimals$4kHealth$4kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$4kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,700
Median grant
4
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$6,000
FRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC$1,700
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$700
WHEATON FOUNDATION$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIEND SARASOTA COUNTY PARK: $3k → 9%EDISON WINTER ESTATES: $700 → 11%ANIMAL COALITION: $700 → 13%ROME FLOYD HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 → 15%COALITION: $600 → 15%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1k → 7%OCHSNE DEPARTMENT OF PHILANTHROPY: $4k → 15%CITY PARK CONSERVANCY: $2k → 23%FRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC: $2k → 9%ANIMAL COALITION: $500 → 13%COALITION: $500 → 15%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $800 → 7%OCHSNE DEPARTMENT OF PHILANTHROPY: $4k → 15%CITY PARK CONSERVANCY: $2k → 23%FRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC: $2k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $700 → 7%OCHSNER HEALTH DEPT OF PHILANTHROPY: $3k → 15%CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER: $750 → 23%FRIEND SARASOTA COUNTY PARK: $600 → 9%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $500 → 7%THE OGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART INC: $750 → 23%FRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC: $600 → 9%INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $500 → 7%OGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART INC: $500 → 23%FRIENDS OF LEGACY TRAIL: $2k → 9%CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER: $500 → 23%FRIENDS OF LEGACY TRAIL: $500 → 9%BROTHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $6k → 23%FRIENDS OF THE LEGACY TRAIL INC: $300 → 9%FRIENDS OF CITY PARK: $4k → 23%VENICE BEAUTIFICATION INC: $1k → 9%LOUISIANA SPCA: $3k → 23%VENICE AREA BEAUTIFICATION INC: $500 → 9%VENICE BEAUTIFICATION INC: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$32k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+158%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CITY PARK CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +14%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +57%
  • OM
    OGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CITY PARK
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +48%
  • OH
    OCHSNER HEALTH DEPT OF PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • LS
    LOUISIANA SPCA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Venice Italy Inc
Philanthropy
2
Saint Peters Landmark Preservation Trust
3
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
4
Sonoma Botanical Garden
5
Friends of Jemison Park

To preserve and protect the natural attractions of robert jemison park.

6
Renaissance Committee

Preservation of historic savannah

Human Services
7
The Bay Park Conservancy Inc

The bay park conservancy (bpc) was formed to implement the master plan approved by the sarasota city commission to conserve 53 acres of public land for a signature park along sarasota bay. the bpc entered a long-term partnership with the…

Community Improvement
8
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

9
Huron-Clinton Metroparks Foundation

To provide critical support to sustain the huron-clinton metoropolitan authority for the enrichment of the people and environment of southeast michigan

Public Benefit
10
Friends of Patterson Park Inc

To preserve and promote Patterson Park.

Environment
11
Riverfront Museum Park

Support and sustain a vibrant and healthy facility that enables our member organizations to showcase the arts and sciences.

12
Roanoke Parks Foundation
Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of City Park and the most unlike its peers is Wheaton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OCHSNE DEPARTMENT OF PHILANTHROPY — $8,000 · OtherOCHSNE DEPARTMENT OF PHILANTHROPYBROTHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $6,000 · OtherBROTHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSFRIENDS OF CITY PARK — $4,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CITY PARKFRIEND SARASOTA COUNTY PARK — $3,600 · OtherFRIEND SARASOTA COUNTY PARKOCHSNER HEALTH DEPT OF PHILANTHROPY — $3,000 · OtherOCHSNER HEALTH DEPT OF PHILANTHROPYLOUISIANA SPCA — $3,000 · OtherLOUISIANA SPCAFRIENDS OF LEGACY TRAIL — $2,750 · OtherFRIENDS OF LEGACY TRAILVENICE BEAUTIFICATION INC — $1,500 · OtherANIMAL COALITION — $1,200 · Other+2 more — $1,800 · OtherFRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF SARASO…CITY PARK CONSERVANCY — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsCITY PARK CONSERV…FRIENDS OF THE LEGACY TRAIL INC — $300 · Recreation & SportsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $3,500 · Civil RightsContemporary Arts Center — $1,250 · Arts & CultureOGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART — $1,250 · Arts & CultureWHEATON FOUNDATION — $600 · PhilanthropyVENICE AREA BEAUTIFICATION INC — $500 · EnvironmentROME FLOYD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $250 · Animals
Other$34,850Recreation & Sports$7,800Civil Rights$3,500Arts & Culture$2,500Philanthropy$600Environment$500Animals$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC — $4,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CITY PARK — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY PARK CONSERVANCY — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetContemporary Arts Center — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition — $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWHEATON FOUNDATION — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE AREA BEAUTIFICATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LEGACY TRAIL INC — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROME FLOYD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Helis FoundationLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Helis Foundation · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott R Wheaton Foundation Co Regions Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph