Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scott Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$27kAnimals$21kHuman Services$14kHousing & Shelter$4kEducation$2kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$292k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY PROMISE OF BRYAN-COLLEGE STA$2,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CH$2,000
POWER FOR PARKINSON'S$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HOPE FOR WIDOWS FOUNDATION$2,000
ANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS$1,000
FRIENDS FOR LIFE$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
BAT WORLD SANCTUARY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$68k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+392%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS OF TEXAS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue -48%
  • SH
    SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k
  • SH
    Shriner's Hospital for Children
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +392%
  • TS
    TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +117%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws for Life K9 Rescue

Pflk9 pulls dogs from city and county shelters and places them in our paws for life (pfl) california state prison program with our incarcerated trainers who are able to dedicate all of their time to their rehabilitation. after several…

Animals
2
The Texas Ferret Lovers Rescue

Texas Ferret Lovers Rescue is a no-kill organization dedicated to providing a safe and healthy environment along with quality care until loving homes can be found. We also provide sanctuary care for ferrets that are not adoptable due to…

Animals
3
Fyims Inc

We save animals' lives. we find creative ways to do it and are passionate about success at it. animals are our primary clients and everything we do is based on what is in their best interest individually, or as a group.

Youth Development
4
Warriors Keep

Adopt shelter and rescue dogs to be trained as service dogs for veterans suffering with post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury to aid in restoring emotional and physical independence.

Public Benefit
5
Furever Friends Rescue

Adoption services for orphaned pets

6
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

7
Blue Waters Dog Rescue

We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…

Animals
8
Wardogs-Making It Home Inc

We serve veterans with Post Traumatic Syndrome Disease, Traumatic Brain Injuries, and Military Sexual Trauma by finding service dogs that we rescue and train for the Veterans specific needs. We have matched over 79 veterans with dogs and…

Human Services
9
Home Front Warriors Project

We help veterans and first responders relieve symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome so they can live better. we are a non-profit post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome clinic for…

10
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
11
Sweet Dreams Senior Pet Sanctuary

The mission of sweet dreams senior pet sanctuary is to support elderly individuals who can no longer care for their senior pets by providing a safe and loving home for their cherished companions. the sanctuary offers two primary programs…

Animals
12
Friends for Life Animal Rescue

Our mission is to resuce dogs and cats from the street. to spay or neuter, innoculate and care for them until homes are found. in addition, the second part of our mission is to educate the public ont he importance of spaying and neutering…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends for Life and the most unlike its peers is Bat World Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CH — $12,700 · OtherSHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHShriner's Hospital for Children — $10,000 · OtherShriner's Hospital for ChildrenFAMILY PROMISE OF BRYAN-COLLEGE STA — $4,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF BRYAN-COLLEGE STAHOPE FOR WIDOWS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · OtherHOPE FOR WIDOWS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,700 · OtherANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS OF TEXAS INC — $20,200 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS OF TEXA…BAT WORLD SANCTUARY — $1,090 · AnimalsPOWER FOR PARKINSONS — $4,000 · HealthPOWER FOR P…FRIENDS FOR LIFE — $3,000 · HealthFRIENDS FOR…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Education
Other$38,400Animals$21,290Health$7,000Human Services$3,000Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS OF TEXAS INC — $20,200 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetPOWER FOR PARKINSONS — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAT WORLD SANCTUARY — $1,090 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER VOLUNTEERS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds POWER FOR PARKINSONS
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds BAT WORLD SANCTUARY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Scott Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Scott Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph