Skip to content
Score International Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Score International Inc

To glorify god through missions in obedience to the great commission through values of evangelism, equipping and empowerment,engaging people through missions and expressing the gospel of jesus christ.

$139k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Youth Development$604kReligion$579kEducation$321kHealth$123kHousing & Shelter$113kPhilanthropy$96kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$5k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $107,998, the rows itemized in this filing. The $139,478 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,480 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$87,998
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$87,998
CARMEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%US INSTITUTE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 14 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$1.7M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-10%

Still filing today

79%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Youth DevelopmentHealthReligionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EY
    EMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $279k · revenue +28%
  • EC
    EMERALD CHARTER SCHOOLS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue +44%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $187k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CL
    CATHY L HODGES MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -10%
  • SR
    Sonscape Re-Creation Ministries Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Knoxville Christian Community Foundation

To grow the capacity of people to become good stewards.

Philanthropy
2
4 Market Square Inc

Primarily to spread the gospel of jesus christ in downtown knoxville, tennessee by serving the community of the greater knoxville area through the provision of services, resources, worship, teaching, fellowship and networking capabilities.

Religion
3
Knox Haven

We recognize that people are unique and face different issues and challenges in their lives. we are committed to serving participants with compassion and dignity as we equip them to grow and accept responsibility for their individual…

Human Services
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Keith Nix Ministries Inc

Spreads the golspel of jesus christ through preaching and teaching the work of god with special emphasis on targeting of young people.

Religion
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
Christ Led Communities Inc Formerly Christian Leadership Concepts

To equip men to initiate and lead for christ in their homes, churches, communities and the marketplace.

—
12
Christian Recovery Centers Inc

To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Knox Area Rescue Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cathy L Hodges Memorial Cancer Foundati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADLEY PRICE MINISTRIES: $515,000 · OtherBRADLEY PRICE MINISTRIESMOUNT CARMEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $120,500 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL+4 more: $30,400 · OtherEMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION: $278,950 · Youth DevelopmentEMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $187,200 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE V…THE CHANGE CENTER: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHANGE CENTERKNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR: $47,700 · Youth DevelopmentKNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR+2 more: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentEMERALD CHARTER SCHOOLS: $200,000 · EducationEMERALD CHAR…NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $87,998 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $43,000 · PhilanthropyCASS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC: $113,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE RESOURCE CENTER: $44,625 · HealthDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $20,000 · HealthCATHY L HODGES MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATI: $15,000 · HealthGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 · ReligionSonscape Re-Creation Ministries Inc: $10,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN HOSPITALITY NETWORK INC: $5,200 · ReligionUS INSTITUTE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$665,900Youth Development$606,350Education$200,000Philanthropy$138,998Housing & Shelter$113,000Health$79,625Religion$39,200Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION: $278,950 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetEMERALD CHARTER SCHOOLS: $200,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $187,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $120,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC: $113,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHANGE CENTER: $75,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetKNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR: $47,700 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHOPE RESOURCE CENTER: $44,625 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $43,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHY L HODGES MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATI: $15,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCASS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS INSTITUTE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Haslam Family Foundat…Trinity Health Founda…Bill and Crissy Hasla…Stowers Machinery Fou…East Tennessee Founda…Ted & Drama Russell F…The Melrose FoundationGene & Florence Monda…Food City Charitable …Thompson Charitable F…Christian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…
Haslam Family Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Haslam Family Foundation Inc · Trinity Health Foundation of East Tennessee · Bill and Crissy Haslam Foundation · Stowers Machinery Foundation Inc · East Tennessee Foundation · Ted & Drama Russell Family Foundation C/O East Tn Foundation · The Melrose Foundation · Gene & Florence Monday Foundation Inc · Food City Charitable Foundation · Thompson Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Score International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Score International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Score International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home