Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schweinfurth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$688kEducation$451kHuman Services$179kArts & Culture$156kRecreation & Sports$91kYouth Development$70kPublic Benefit$19kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MITCHELL FOUNDATION$98,200
MT VERNON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL$15,700
MOUNT VERNON CITY SCHOOLS DIST 80$13,300
MT VERNON TWNSHP HS DIST 201 FDN$10,000
YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY$9,000
MT VERNON REC CENTER INC$7,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS$6,000
MT VERNON FESTIVALS INC$5,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS$5,000
FIELD COMM CONS SCHOOL DIST 3$4,500
BLUFORD UNIT DISTRICT 318$3,500
FARRINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CCSD#99$2,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS$2,500
ROME COMMUNITY CONS SCHOOL DIST 2$2,000
MT VERNON TWNSHP HIGH SCH ORCHESTRA$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $34k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $30k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $24k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $9k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$83k

Still filing today

27%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TY
    The YMCA of Jefferson County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +113%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +56% · 29% of their budget
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • MV
    MT VERNON TWNSHP HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • MV
    MOUNT VERNON CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • JB
    JL BUFORD INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mattoon Sports Complex Inc

To develop, finance and operate an indoor and outdoor sports complex in a blighted area in mattoon, il that will benefit the residents and business communities in illinois.

Community Improvement
2
Grundy County Historical Society

To provide for the people of grundy county, illinois a museum building, collection, and preservation of historical data, records, and artifacts of its people.

—
3
Matteson Youth Athletic Association

Sports program for youth

Recreation & Sports
4
Mvths District 201 Foundation

Organization's mission is to assist, enhance and further the educational programs and endeavors of mt. vernon township high school district 201, jefferson county, illinois.

Education
5
Jefferson County Development Corporation

The Jefferson County Development Corporation is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to promote economic development in the area of Jefferson County, Illinois by maintaining resource information, such as workforce data, geographic…

Community Improvement
6
Frg Recreation Council

Promote, sponsor and regulate recreation programs for the Village of Fox River Grove, Ill.

Youth Development
7
Monroe County Fair

To promote the developement of the resources of monroe county, illinois, in all lines of agriculture, home economics, education, and business through the medium of an annual county fair.

—
8
Vernon Hills Community Baseball & Softball Inc

The organization is committed to providing quality youth sports in vernon hills, illinois

Recreation & Sports
9
Illinois Science Olympiad

Organizes and conducts science competition in schools

Education
10
Crawford County Recreation Center

The crawford county recreation center strengthens the community by providing a venue and programming for everyone in crawford county to improve their health and the health of their community, to engage in youth development to nurture the…

Recreation & Sports
11
Mchenry County Illinois Genealogical Society

To foster an interest in genealogy among the public. To provide instruction in current research methods and practices. To support the preservation of and access to genealogical and historical records, especially those pertaining to McHenry…

—
12
Mount Vernon Preservation Society
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of South Central Illinois; the most unlike its peers is Brennan Klein Field Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MITCHELL FOUNDATION: $669,330 · OtherMITCHELL FOUNDATIONMT VERNON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $163,650 · OtherMT VERNON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOLJEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $70,000 · OtherMT VERNON CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $67,050 · OtherMT VERNON TWNSHP HS DIST 201 FDN: $47,500 · Other+31 more: $358,680 · Other+31 moreThe YMCA of Jefferson County: $146,500 · Human ServicesThe YMCA …Brennan Klein Field Foundation: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsROME GRADE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $27,000 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $22,100 · Youth DevelopmentMT VERNON FESTIVALS INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $19,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,376,210Human Services$146,500Recreation & Sports$50,000Education$27,000Youth Development$22,100Arts & Culture$21,000Philanthropy$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe YMCA of Jefferson County: $146,500 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $70,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetBrennan Klein Field Foundation: $50,000 over 3y, 99% of budgetROME GRADE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $22,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMT VERNON FESTIVALS INC: $21,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $19,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The YMCA of Jefferson County ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Brennan Klein Field Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROME GRADE SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds MT VERNON FESTIVALS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds MT VERNON REC CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schweinfurth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schweinfurth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schweinfurth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph