Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schwarz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$12MEducation$4.0MHealth$3.4MScience & Tech$2.3MHuman Services$2.1MArts & Culture$2.0MReligion$1.3MPhilanthropy$367kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $835k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.3M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$1,880,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$1,000,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$420,000
AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY$420,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$320,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY$300,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$200,000
SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND$200,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK$120,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$110,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NEW JERSEY$105,487
NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$100,000
THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS$25,000
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER$25,000
ROSE HOUSE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $765k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROSE HOUSE: $25k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $15k → 4%ROSE HOUSE: $15k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%THE ROSE HOUSE: $10k → 4%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $100k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 41 repeat orgs$744k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
15

Total granted

$21M
$634k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+80%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +61%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +16%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +167%
  • NP
    NY PRESBYTERIAN FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
The Jerusalem Connection
—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Springfield First Aid Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOW FUNDS: $8,175,070 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOW FUNDSUNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $840,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEALJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $457,961 · Other+29 more: $908,646 · Other+29 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $2,291,605 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $355,750 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…+3 more: $124,400 · InternationalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,500,000 · HealthDana-Farber Canc…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $750,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMER…BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC: $500,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL LAHE…NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $150,000 · Health+3 more: $70,000 · HealthPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,330,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL END…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $240,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH …AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $2,620,000 · EducationAMERICANS F…NEWARK ACADEMY: $120,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Education+1 more: $10,450 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,720,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $124,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $56,000 · Arts & CultureHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $650,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROSE HOUSE: $115,000 · Human Services
Other$10,381,677International$3,971,755Health$3,970,000Philanthropy$3,570,000Education$2,860,450Arts & Culture$2,100,000Human Services$765,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,330,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $2,620,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $2,291,605 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,720,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $750,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $650,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $355,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $240,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ: $199,196 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $124,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROSE HOUSE: $115,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $109,850 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST RESOURCE FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $23,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC: $13,550 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $10,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America Foundation: $9,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD PBA LOCAL #76 INC: $3,200 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMountainside Rescue Squad Borough of Mountainside NJ: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH PHARMACY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST RESOURCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schwarz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schwarz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schwarz’s filings →

More from the funding graph