Skip to content
Schockett Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Schockett Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$40kInternational$2kHuman Services$879Youth Development$400Public Safety & Disaster$400Health$250Arts & Culture$150Philanthropy$120Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$180
Median grant
3
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG KOLLEL KOL AARON$1,800
CONG ZICHRON RABBEINU MOSHE FEINSTEIN$1,225
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$360
MESAMCHE LEV$329
ZAKA TEL AVIV$300
YESHIVA OHR SIMCHA OF ENGLEWOOD$180
YAD L'ACHIM USA INC$180
SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND$125
Individual grant recipient$120
LEV L'ACHIM$75
KEREN ANIYIM$72
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $75 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 → 20%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $50 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 → 20%Misaskim: $200 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $122 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $100 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%Misaskim: $100 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $75 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $72 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $50 → 20%Keren Aniyem: $50 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 26 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
23

Total granted

$40k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+50%

Still filing today

35%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $735 · revenue +70%
  • MC
    MISASKIM CORP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $575 · revenue +34%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $225 · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • MU
    MIKVAH USA INCgraduated
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +121%
  • YD
    YESHIVA DARCHEI ALIYA
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
6
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
9
Ezreinu Inc
Health
10
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
11
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agudath Israel of America; the most unlike its peers is Hebron Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG KOLLEL KOL AARON: $13,800 · OtherCONG KOLLEL KOL AARONCONG ZICHRON RABBEINU MOSHE FEINSTEIN: $8,703 · OtherCONG ZICHRON RABBEINU MOSHE FEINSTEINIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $2,180 · OtherMikvah of Mill Basin: $1,641 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL MISHNAS ELIEZER: $1,450 · Other+31 more: $12,280 · Other+31 moreMIKVAH USA INC: $1,800 · ReligionSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $735 · ReligionYESHIVA DARCHEI ALIYA: $500 · Religion+1 more: $54 · ReligionKEREN ANIYIM INC: $594 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $575 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $225 · Human ServicesZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $400 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUND INC: $120 · PhilanthropyGOVOAH SPECIAL PROJECTS INC: $400 · Recreation & SportsEZER MIZION: $100 · InternationalDISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $150 · Arts & Culture
Other$42,554Religion$3,089Human Services$1,394Philanthropy$520Recreation & Sports$400International$200Arts & Culture$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $1,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL MISHNAS ELIEZER: $1,450 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $735 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $594 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $575 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DARCHEI ALIYA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOVOAH SPECIAL PROJECTS INC: $400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $225 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $104 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI RAPHAEL CHESED ORGANIZATION IN: $54 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $54 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $40 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIKVAH USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL MISHNAS ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN ANIYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DARCHEI ALIYA ↗
  • Who funds Zaka Tel-Aviv Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOVOAH SPECIAL PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OF COURAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Jimmy and Berta K…Alyad Foundation IncThe Ojc FundThe Jacob Moses Found…The Reich Family Char…Allen I Gross Charita…The J W FoundationThe Basch Family Foun…Zichron Chaim Charity…The Jmg FoundationThe Setton Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY22× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Jacob Moses Foundation Inc · The Reich Family Charitable Trust · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · The J W Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · The Setton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schockett Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schockett Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schockett Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home