Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$790k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.6MHuman Services$1.3MEducation$655kSocial Science$435kHealth$350kCrime & Legal$305kFood & Nutrition$190kArts & Culture$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $385k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHEDRAL OF ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION$240,000
IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$60,000
VITAE FOUNDATION$50,000
SPECIAL LEARNING CENTER$50,000
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$40,000
THE NATIONAL SHRINE OF MARY MOTHER OF CHURCH$40,000
SALVATION ARMY$30,000
CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI$25,000
RAPE AND ABUSE CRISIS CENTER$25,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$25,000
THE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI$25,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
CONCEPTION ABBY$20,000
SAMARITAN CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $960k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ST RAYMONDS SOCIETY: $40k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $35k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $50k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $40k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $25k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $25k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $25k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $25k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTERAL & NORTHERN MISSORI: $25k → 17%SAMARITAN CENTER: $20k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $10k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $50k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $50k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $50k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $30k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
WY
OH
CA
CO
MO
KS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 26 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
7

Total granted

$4.6M
$390k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VITAE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $435k · revenue +19%
  • CC
    CAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $425k · revenue +354%
  • SR
    St Raymond's Society
    6× · 2018–2023 · $290k · revenue +415%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITY
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • MN
    MOTHER NATIONAL SHRINE OF MARY
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri Inc

A faith-based organization providing compassionaite, quality social services to the vulnerable.

Human Services
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
8
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
9
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
10
Southeast Missouri Food Bank Inc

The mission of the southeast missouri food bank is to promote food recovery; acquire and distribute food and household products; and provide community leadership and education on issues of hunger and poverty in an effort to alleviate…

Food & Nutrition
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Mercy Medical Center - Centerville

We, mercy medical center - centerville and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communitites. mercy medical center - centerville is a member of trinity…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Benedictine College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VITAE FOUNDATION: $435,000 · OtherVITAE FOUNDATIONCATHEDRAL OF ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $420,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF ST JOSEPH FOUNDATIONCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $310,056 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACHRAPE AND ABUSE CRISIS CENTER: $300,000 · OtherRAPE AND ABUSE CRISIS CENTERDIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITY: $250,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITYTHE NATIONAL SHRINE OF MARY MOTHER OF CHURCH: $225,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL SHRINE OF MARY MOTHER OF CHURCHST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $205,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $180,000 · OtherIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST - CRU MINISTRIES: $120,000 · Other+18 more: $655,000 · Other+18 moreSt Raymond's Society: $290,000 · Human ServicesSt Raymond's SocietyCENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $260,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL MISSOURI FOST…Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $215,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of…THE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $195,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAMARITAN CENTER …CAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $425,000 · EducationCAPITAL CITY…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILL…Benedictine College: $60,000 · EducationBenedictine …THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $190,000 · Food & NutritionCOVENANT NETWORK: $150,000 · ReligionSHOW-ME INSTITUTE: $95,000 · PhilanthropyAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $45,000 · Health
Other$3,100,056Human Services$960,000Education$565,000Food & Nutrition$190,000Religion$150,000Philanthropy$95,000Health$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $435,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $425,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetSt Raymond's Society: $290,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $260,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $215,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $195,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $190,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT NETWORK: $150,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetSHOW-ME INSTITUTE: $95,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds St Raymond's Society ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SHOW-ME INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orscheln Industries Foundation IncMO19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · A J Schwartze Community Foundation · United Way of Central Missouri Inc · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Greater Horizons · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph