Skip to content
Scandling Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Scandling Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$258k
Granted FY2017
27
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Scandling Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Silicon Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Scandling Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $258k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
0
’18
0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$6.1MEducation$72kYouth Development$41kArts & Culture$31kEnvironment$21kCrime & Legal$10kEmployment$10kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2017 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $237k
$10,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$12,000
BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY$10,250
REDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,250
EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FDN$10,250
SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITITIES LEAGUE$10,250
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$10,250
MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE$10,250
JOBTRAIN (FORMERLY OICW)$10,250
CONSERVATION EARTH INC$10,250
MUSIC IN THE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION (MIS)$10,250
JOSE VALDEZ MATH FOUNDATION$10,250
GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST$10,250
SPARK$10,250
GIRLS ON THE RUN$10,250
MUSIC IN SCHOOLS TODAY$10,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REDWOOD CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY: $10k → 8%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $10k → 10%GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $10k → 12%SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%ST ANTHONY PADUA CHURCH DINING ROOM: $5k → 12%SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITITIES LEAGUE: $10k → 7%MUSIC IN THE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION (MIS): $10k → 8%MUSIC IN SCHOOLS TODAY: $10k → 10%MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FDN: $10k → 8%SPARK: $10k → 10%REDWOOD CITY FRIENDS OF LITERACY: $10k → 7%ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS INC: $10k → 8%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $10k → 10%CONSERVATION EARTH INC: $10k → 7%FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH (FLY): $10k → 8%826 VALENCIA: $10k → 10%BUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT (BUILD): $10k → 7%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5.0M → 8%JOBTRAIN (FORMERLY OICW): $10k → 7%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $296k → 8%PENINSULA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 7%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $289k → 8%NATIONAL CENTER FOR EQUINE: $5k → 7%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $280k → 8%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $230k → 8%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5k → 8%JOSE VALDEZ MATH FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
2
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
3
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

—
4
Community Resources for Science

CRS empowers teachers and STEM professionals serving schools in historically marginalized communities to activate TK-8 students curiosity about the world, foster critical thinking, and inspire children to imagine future career pathways.…

Education
5
Bay Education Fund

Build a community investment fund that catalyzes local movements and transforms district capacity by bringing together families,communities, teachers, district leaders, and philanthropy to co-design a vision for students and implement…

Education
6
Sonoma Valley Education Foundation

The Sonoma Valley Education Foundation exists to improve education by enriching teaching, inspiring learning, and advancing innovative programs that enable every student to succeed.

Philanthropy
7
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
8
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
9
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
10
City Surf Project

To ensure equitable access to the coastline and improve the health and well-being of Bay Area youth, through surf instruction. We use surfing as a vehicle to foster respect for nature, healthy living, personal growth, diversity, equity and…

Recreation & Sports
11
San Leandro Education Foundation

SLED partners with the community and San Leandro public schools to provide students with robust educational experiences and innovative programming.

Unclassified
12
Girlventures

GirlVentures provides outdoor programs during the summer and afterschool year round for Bay Area girls age 11-17. Our mission is to inspire girls to lead through outdoor adventure, inner discovery and collective action.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Silicon Valley; the most unlike its peers is Spark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $6,117,413 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation+2 more: $20,250 · PhilanthropyREDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,250 · OtherMUSIC IN THE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION (MIS): $10,250 · OtherSPARK: $10,250 · OtherJOSE VALDEZ MATH FOUNDATION: $10,250 · OtherBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT (BUILD): $10,250 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN: $10,250 · OtherMarine Science Institute: $10,250 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $10,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5,125 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR EQUINE: $5,125 · OtherPENINSULA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,125 · OtherST ANTHONY PADUA CHURCH DINING ROOM: $5,125 · OtherSAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentREDWOOD CITY FRIENDS OF LITERACY: $10,250 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY: $10,250 · EducationREDWOOD CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,250 · Education826 Valencia: $10,250 · EducationMusic In Schools Today: $10,250 · Arts & CultureCONSERVATION EARTH INC: $10,250 · AnimalsJOBTRAIN INC: $10,250 · EmploymentEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $10,250 · Environment
Philanthropy$6,137,663Other$102,250Youth Development$41,000Education$41,000Arts & Culture$10,250Animals$10,250Employment$10,250Environment$10,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $6,117,413 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,250 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $10,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,250 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMusic In Schools Today: $10,250 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCONSERVATION EARTH INC: $10,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSPARK: $10,250 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $10,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $10,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $10,250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetREDWOOD CITY FRIENDS OF LITERACY: $10,250 over 1y, 15% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY: $10,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $10,250 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREDWOOD CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,250 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMarine Science Institute: $10,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budget826 Valencia: $10,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSacramento Region Community Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Atkinson FoundationGordon E and Betty I …The San Francisco Fou…The Heising-Simons Fo…Tides FoundationThe Doering Family Fo…Quest FoundationBothin FoundationPhilanthropic Venture…The David and Lucile …Morgan Stanley Global…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA24.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Doering Family Foundation · Quest Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scandling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scandling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scandling Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home