Skip to content

· Public charity

Saviour USA - One World Charity

Help individuals and families financially, support, and invest in education, medical and job placement.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$662kEducation$101kPhilanthropy$85kReligion$13kArts & Culture$7kFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $110,138, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,699,608 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,589,470 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$15,450
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Al-Khoei Foundation$80,038
Mintadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy$15,450
Al-Hadi Initiatives$7,500
Hur Social Services$7,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Care for Humanity: $25k → 11%Al Kisa Foundation: $10k → 8%Mntadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy: $25k → 14%Al Khoei Foundation: $188k → 13%Hur Social Services: $7k → 8%IMAM Mahdi Association of Marjaeya: $7k → 21%Care for Humanity: $25k → 11%Al Kisa Foundation: $6k → 8%Mintadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy: $17k → 14%Al Khoei Foundation: $98k → 13%Hur Social Services: $7k → 8%Care for Humanity: $14k → 11%Mintadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy: $15k → 14%Al-Khoei Foundation: $95k → 13%Hur Social Services: $6k → 8%Care for Humanity: $14k → 11%Montadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy: $13k → 14%Al-Khoei Foundation: $80k → 13%Care for Humanity: $8k → 11%Montadhar Peace School dba Guide Academy: $8k → 14%Al Khoei Foundation: $73k → 13%Al Khoei Foundation: $73k → 13%Al Khoei Foundation: $55k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $959k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$953k · 99% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Food, Education, Medical, Housing · Medical and Health camps · No Cost Housing

Middle East and North Africa$6k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Medical camps

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$845k · 4 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$845k
$22k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    AL-KHOEI BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $662k
  • CF
    CARE FOR HUMANITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +75%
  • MP
    MONTADHAR PEACE SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $78k · revenue -48%

Funded once

  • AK
    Al Kisa Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IM
    IMAM MAHDI ASSOCIATION OF MARJAEYA INC IMAM
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IE
    IMAMIA EDUCATION CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AL-KHOEI BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION INC: $662,250 · OtherAL-KHOEI BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $22,357 · OtherMONTADHAR PEACE SCHOOL: $78,045 · EducationMONTADHAR P…AL HADI INITIATIVES: $7,500 · EducationAL HADI INI…CARE FOR HUMANITY: $85,346 · PhilanthropyCARE FOR HU…HUR SOCIAL SERVICE AND ISLAMIC NETWORK INC: $19,700 · Arts & Culture
Other$684,607Education$85,545Philanthropy$85,346Arts & Culture$19,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARE FOR HUMANITY: $85,346 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetMONTADHAR PEACE SCHOOL: $78,045 over 5y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARE FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds MONTADHAR PEACE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HUR SOCIAL SERVICE AND ISLAMIC NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AL HADI INITIATIVES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saviour USA - One World Charity funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saviour USA - One World Charity. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saviour USA - One World Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph