Skip to content

· Private foundation

Saul D Levy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Environment$27kHealth$24kEducation$20kAnimals$12kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$3kCivil Rights$2kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$733k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA OPERATIONN MENDUCLA FOUNDATION$20,000
FONTENELLE FOREST$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$4,000
US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION$4,000
GREENPEACE INC$3,000
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$3,000
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST$3,000
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$3,000
ST JOHNS HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$2,000
BORN FREE USA$1,000
CLIMATE CENTRAL INC$1,000
PHS COMMISSIONED OFFICERS FOUNDATION$1,000
HUMAN SOCIETY OF THE US$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FONTENELLE FOREST: $10k → 6%UCLA OPERATIONN MENDUCLA FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%CDC FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4k → 14%US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $4k → 5%CLIMATE CENTRAL INC: $1k → 11%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3k → 6%PHS COMMISSIONED OFFICERS FDN FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH INC: $1k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%ST JOHNS HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4k → 14%US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3k → 6%PHS COMMISSIONED OFFICERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%HUMAN SOCIETY OF THE US: $1k → 14%UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 5%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3k → 6%HUMAN SOCIETY OF THE US: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $3k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT FELLOWS: $1k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND: $5k → 14%GREENPEACE INC: $3k → 14%BORN FREE USA: $1k → 14%BORN FREE USA: $1k → 14%BORN FREE USA: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$54k · 7 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$54k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+31%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationAnimalsEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +64%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +72%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • GREENPEACE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • CF
    CDC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -45%
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT FELLOWS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
7
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
8
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenpeace Inc; the most unlike its peers is United States Equestrian Team Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA OPERATIONN MENDUCLA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherUCLA OPERATIONN MENDUCLA FOUNDATIONFONTENELLE FOREST: $10,000 · OtherFONTENELLE FORESTGREENPEACE INC: $3,000 · OtherGREENPEACE INCHUMAN SOCIETY OF THE US: $2,000 · OtherHUMAN SOCIETY OF THE US+2 more: $2,000 · Other+2 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPHS Commissioned Officers Foundation for the: $2,000 · EducationPHS Commissioned Officer…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE…GREENPEACE FUND INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUN…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $9,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILD…Born Free USA united with API: $3,000 · AnimalsBorn Free USA…UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STAT…CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $3,000 · Food & NutritionSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthCLIMATE CENTRAL INC: $1,000 · Science & Tech
Other$37,000Education$22,000Environment$13,000Animals$12,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Health$2,000Science & Tech$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBorn Free USA united with API: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHS Commissioned Officers Foundation for the: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE CENTRAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCDC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saul D Levy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saul D Levy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Saul D Levy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Saul D Levy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saul D Levy’s filings →

More from the funding graph