· Public charity
Santa Fe Indian School Inc
Provide educational and residential opportunities for native american children in grades 7-12.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RED WILLOW FARM | $15,000 |
| PUEBLO OF ACOMA | $15,000 |
| PUEBLO OF JEMEZ | $15,000 |
| KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER | $15,000 |
| SEVENTH GENERATION FUND | $15,000 |
| PUEBLO OF ZIA | $15,000 |
| TEWA WOMEN UNITED | $15,000 |
| SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT | $15,000 |
| PUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE | $15,000 |
| SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO | $15,000 |
| NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC | $15,000 |
| SBS EVALUATION & PROGRAM DEV | $15,000 |
| TAOS PUEBLO | $15,000 |
| UNM FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve and perpetuate pueblo culture and to advance understanding by presenting with dignity and respect the accomplishments and evolving history of the pueblo people of new mexico.
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Wesst is a home to entrepreneurs providing a support system of consulting, training, incubation, and lending to help new mexicans strengthen and grow their small businesses through sustainable business models, financial empowerment, and…
Empowering indigenous communities to reconnect with, regenerate, and conserve their sacred peyote medicine.
El centro de igualdad y derechos is a civil rights and workers justice organization based in central new mexico that combines organizing, leadership development, information campaigns, and policy education.
The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.
To address climate change by investing in New Mexico projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions climate impacts and energy cost burdens prioritizing underserved communities.
Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…
Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.
Changing woman initiative (cwi) personnel are indigenous leaders and community healers, centering our families and communities, transforming the cultural narrative and setting in motion policy changes. our mission is to support our diverse…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Red Willow Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds Red Willow Center ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Mexico Community Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · WK Kellogg Foundation · Chamiza Foundation · The Notah Begay III Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Santa Fe Indian School Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Santa Fe Indian School Inc?
Find your warmest path to Santa Fe Indian School Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.