Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sanford J Grossman Charitable Trust CO Quantitative Financial Strategies

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$984k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$539k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$7.1MHealth$4.4MArts & Culture$88kScience & Tech$20kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $400k
  • $250k+1 grant · $539k
$84,045
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mt Sinai Health System$539,195
University of California Los Angele$87,714
University of California Los Angele$85,450
University of California Los Angele$84,485
University of California Los Angele$84,045
University of Chicago$58,746
University of Chicago$33,000
University of California Los Angele$8,700
Judicial Watch$3,000
Advance Colorado$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20k → 10%University of California Los Angele: $88k → 14%ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $30k → 6%National Jewish Health: $50k → 12%University of Chicago: $192k → 14%University of California Los Angele: $85k → 14%SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%University of Chicago: $178k → 14%University of California Los Angele: $84k → 14%Columbia University: $1.0M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $175k → 14%University of California Los Angele: $84k → 14%Columbia University: $878k → 17%University of Chicago: $125k → 14%University of California Los Angele: $9k → 14%Columbia University: $813k → 17%University of Chicago: $125k → 14%Columbia University: $807k → 17%University of Chicago: $125k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $739k → 17%University of Chicago: $125k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $500k → 17%University of Chicago: $125k → 14%Columbia University: $125k → 17%University of Chicago: $124k → 14%CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF LINCOLN CENTER: $25k → 17%University of Chicago: $123k → 14%Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Ce: $5k → 17%University of Chicago: $117k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $954k → 17%University of Chicago: $59k → 14%CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF LINCOLN CENTER: $5k → 17%University of Chicago: $50k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $890k → 17%University of Chicago: $50k → 14%University of Chicago: $48k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $763k → 17%University of Chicago: $48k → 14%University of Chicago: $33k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $539k → 17%University of Chicago: $26k → 14%University of Chicago: $25k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $408k → 17%University of Chicago: $25k → 14%University of Chicago: $25k → 14%Mt Sinai Health System: $181k → 17%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $400k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Sanford J Grossman Charitable Trust CO Quantitative Financial Strategies’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Sanford J Grossman Charitable Trust CO Quantitative Financial Strategieslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$5.7M
$763k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+52%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $353k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPublic BenefitScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +52%
  • TC
    The Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +130%
  • LC
    LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $400k · revenue +52%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +64%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Hospital and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $4,868,047 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKUniversity of Chicago — $1,927,126 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $400,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIMt Sinai Health System — $3,735,613 · OtherMt Sinai Health SystemREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $350,394 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA+2 more — $3,200 · OtherTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $249,987 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $50,000 · HealthThe Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center Inc — $40,000 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER — $30,215 · Arts & CultureTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC — $9,500 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $5,400 · Arts & CultureSIMONS LAUFER MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE — $20,000 · Science & TechJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $3,000 · Public BenefitADVANCE COLORADO — $1,100 · Public Benefit
Education$7,195,173Other$4,089,207Health$299,987Arts & Culture$85,115Science & Tech$20,000Public Benefit$4,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $4,868,047 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,927,126 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $249,987 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER — $30,215 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSIMONS LAUFER MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE COLORADO — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sanford J Grossman Charitable Trust CO Quantitative Financial Strategies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph