Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandve Heritage Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$180kHealth$48kReligion$35kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$15kArts & Culture$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$853k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC Education Foundation$20,000
Bethany Lutheran Church ELCA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,450
Jackson County Historical Society$1,800
Jackson Healthcare Foundation$1,700
Windom Area Hospital Foundation$1,700
Salvation Army of Jackson County$1,500
Sunset Cottage Hospice Worthington$1,100
Jackson Food Shelf Inc$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
SWMN Global Mission Fund of the ELC$500
Good Samaritan Society of Jackson$500
American Red Cross SW MN$500
Lutheran Indian Ministries$500
Odini CircuitAmerican Lutheran Chur$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Atlas of Spencer: $1k → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $1k → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $1k → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $1k → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $800 → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $800 → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $500 → 9%Atlas of Spencer: $500 → 9%Client Community Services: $3k → 11%Client Community Services: $2k → 11%Client Community Services: $500 → 11%Client Community Services: $500 → 11%Client Community Services: $500 → 11%Client Community Services: $250 → 11%Client Community Services: $250 → 11%Client Community Services: $250 → 11%Client Community Services: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$340k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

35%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +24%
  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • CC
    CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • WM
    WTL Ministries
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Iowa Health Foundation
Religion
2
The Jackson Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Iowa Specialty Hospital Foundation - Clarion
Health
4
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
5
The J W Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Life Resource Services of Jackson County

Our mission is to help those who are struggling with homelessness, by providing resources to help rebuild their lives.

Human Services
7
Bjh Foundation for Senior Services Carolina Foundation for Jewish Seniors
Human Services
8
St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson
—
9
Jackson Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Iowa West Foundation
—
11
Jsw Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jacksonville Medical Center Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson County Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JCC Education Foundation: $180,000 · OtherJCC Education FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $20,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSunset Cottage Hospice Worthington: $14,550 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,614 · Other+14 more: $59,950 · Other+14 moreJackson Health Care Foundation Inc: $16,250 · HealthJackson He…WINDOM AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,250 · HealthWINDOM ARE…JACKSON FOOD SHELF INC: $14,833 · Food & NutritionCLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesATLAS OF SPENCER: $6,600 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$285,514Health$32,500Food & Nutrition$14,833Human Services$13,600Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJackson Health Care Foundation Inc: $16,250 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetWINDOM AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,250 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetJACKSON FOOD SHELF INC: $14,833 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,614 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetATLAS OF SPENCER: $6,600 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWTL Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $4,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINDOM AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON FOOD SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS OF SPENCER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WTL Ministries ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandve Heritage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandve Heritage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sandve Heritage Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sandve Heritage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandve Heritage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph