Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Francisco Tavern Guild Foundation

To provide a source of funds for local charitable organizations.

$553k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$381kHealth$326kAnimals$257kFood & Nutrition$139kYouth Development$94kHousing & Shelter$83kCrime & Legal$37kCivil Rights$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $280,908 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $553,454 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $272,546 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $121k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $160k
$6,824
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA CASA DE LAS MADRES$29,719
MUTTVILLE SENIOR DOG RESCUE$19,666
SFSPCA$18,209
ASIAN WOMENS SHELTER$15,443
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$14,770
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM$13,605
PROJECT OPEN HAND$13,537
SF AIDS FOUNDATION$12,966
SF WOMENS CENTER INC$11,409
THE SF FOOD BANK$10,950
SF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$9,489
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS$8,704
SF WOMEN AGAINST RAPE$8,400
LYRIC$8,169
COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER$6,824
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $5k → 8%HOMELESS CHILDRENS NETWORK: $7k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $6k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $6k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $6k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $11k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $9k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $9k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $7k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $6k → 10%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $6k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SV: $5k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $6k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $6k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $6k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $6k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $5k → 10%PAWS FOR PAWS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 24 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+25%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • La Casa de las Madres
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k · revenue +75%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • AE
    AIDS EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • P
    PRCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +84%
  • HC
    Homeless Childrens Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
2
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
5
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
6
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
7
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
8
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
9
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
10
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

11
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
12
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Prisoners Literature Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Support & Child Serv…Lgbtq+ Community Organizati…San Francisco Community Adv…Arts Education & PerformanceMission-Driven FoundationsJewish Community ServicesSports and Recreation ClubsImmigrant Legal & Integrati…Supportive Housing ServicesProfessional Membership Ass…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr19%44%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr19%39%20–35yr16%31%35–55yr13%17%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
11%
694/6,390

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
27/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

La Casa de las Madres — $215,639 · OtherLa Casa de las MadresSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $87,849 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATIONSF WOMENS CENTER INC — $73,824 · OtherSF WOMENS CENTER INCSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $62,078 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS — $55,994 · OtherMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS+16 more — $167,602 · Other+16 moreTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $120,185 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SO…MUTTVILLE — $112,489 · AnimalsMUTTVILLEROCKETDOGRESCUE — $18,025 · AnimalsROCKETDOGRESCUE+1 more — $6,308 · AnimalsPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $122,851 · HealthPlanned Parentho…Homeless Prenatal Program Inc — $65,289 · HealthHomeless Prenata…National AIDS Memorial Inc — $15,190 · HealthNational AIDS Me…Coalition On Homelessness — $47,966 · Human ServicesCoalition…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $34,985 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL H…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ST LOUIS RESIDENCE — $23,477 · Human ServicesLITTLE SI…Homeless Childrens Network — $7,399 · Human ServicesHomeless …BY THE BAY HEALTH — $5,103 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $5,007 · Human ServicesProject Open Hand — $71,590 · Food & NutritionLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC — $27,293 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $20,159 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $46,569 · Philanthropy
Other$662,986Animals$257,007Health$203,330Human Services$123,937Food & Nutrition$71,590Youth Development$47,452Philanthropy$46,569

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLa Casa de las Madres — $215,639 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $122,851 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $120,185 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $112,489 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $87,849 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetProject Open Hand — $71,590 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $65,289 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $62,078 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS — $55,994 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCoalition On Homelessness — $47,966 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $46,569 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $34,985 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC — $27,293 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ST LOUIS RESIDENCE — $23,477 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $20,159 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $19,594 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE — $19,003 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetROCKETDOGRESCUE — $18,025 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPrisoners Literature Project — $17,734 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $15,777 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational AIDS Memorial Inc — $15,190 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetNative American Health Center Inc — $10,588 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS EMERGENCY FUND — $9,836 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHomeless Childrens Network — $7,399 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $6,824 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFreedom for Immigrants — $6,339 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of San Francisco Animal Care and Control — $6,308 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSan Francisco Bicycle Coalition Education Fund Inc — $5,455 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST — $5,277 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAITHFUL FOOLS STREET MINISTRY — $5,244 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH — $5,103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $5,007 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $5,004 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA32× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Impactassetsinc · Horizons Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Francisco Tavern Guild Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Francisco Tavern Guild Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to San Francisco Tavern Guild Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph